The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’

ABSTRACT This article explores the underlying reasons for why the Albanese Labor Governmentʼs stated policy ambition to ‘rebuild Australiaʼs international development program’ has not yet been accomplished and is unlikely to be realised, at least in the near‐to‐medium term. Based on interviews conducted with 21 Australian Members of Parliament, we find that the ‘cautious consensus’—a collection of ideas guiding elite perspectives on Australian aid policy that emerged during the COVID‐19 pandemic—has rapidly consolidated, to the point where it can now be considered a paradigm. We identify three main factors that have led to this consolidation: the declining salience of aid; growing elite scepticism about the usefulness of aid; and a combination of political challenges that are difficult for Labor to navigate, as it seeks to become a long‐term Government. Given the prospects of shifting the unambitious status quo are unlikely in the in the near‐to‐medium term, we examine what ‘living with the cautious consensus’ means for the Australian development sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’

Benjamin Day, Tamas Wells
1 citations
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
International Development and Aid
3.45
article

The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’

Benjamin Day, Tamas Wells
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the underlying reasons for why the Albanese Labor Governmentʼs stated policy ambition to ‘rebuild Australiaʼs international development program’ has not yet been accomplished and is unlikely to be realised, at least in the near‐to‐medium term. Based on interviews conducted with 21 Australian Members of Parliament, we find that the ‘cautious consensus’—a collection of ideas guiding elite perspectives on Australian aid policy that emerged during the COVID‐19 pandemic—has rapidly consolidated, to the point where it can now be considered a paradigm. We identify three main factors that have led to this consolidation: the declining salience of aid; growing elite scepticism about the usefulness of aid; and a combination of political challenges that are difficult for Labor to navigate, as it seeks to become a long‐term Government. Given the prospects of shifting the unambitious status quo are unlikely in the in the near‐to‐medium term, we examine what ‘living with the cautious consensus’ means for the Australian development sector.

Asia & the Pacific Policy StudiesVol. 12(1)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
International Development and Aid
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’ — Benjamin Day, Tamas Wells · Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS