Education and happiness: strategies for achieving happiness in the context of educational policy

The problem and the goal. The topic of the relationship between happiness (wellbeing) and education has been immanently present in theoretical (philosophical, political, religious) discourse and in pedagogical practice since antiquity. However, it owes its relevance, first of all, to the value shift from the values of survival to the values of self-expression and positive education, which, at the same time, contributed to a bias in the consideration of this topic: The emphasis on the pros of this relationship and underestimation of its cons. The intention to draw a more balanced picture sets the following aim of the article: to identify the main strategies for happiness achievement and consider them in the context of educational policy. Materials and methods. The theoretical and methodological background includes comparative and discourse analysis, philosophical reflection of the ideas of ancient thinkers and modern Russian and foreign experts in the field of education and happiness, and their connection. The adjusted version of D. Leontiev’s two-level hedoeudaimonic model of happiness serves as a theoretical framework. Results. Two main strategies for happiness achievement have been established – the upward game and the downward game, which the authors, proceeding from M. Joshanloo’s concept, correlate with culturebased concepts of happiness – individualistic (Western) and collectivistic (non-Western). Characteristics and outcomes of these strategies in closed, liberal and conservative educational systems are presented. The problem is that these strategies are implemented by educational systems in a primarily hedonic rather than eudaimonic way, which results in the frustrating nature of the first strategy and the discriminating (academically unsuccessful and/or low–income students) nature of the second. Conclusion. The happiness construct plays a multifaceted role as an ideological instrument of educational policy and, in turn, education plays an equally intricate role in fostering happiness. The topic under discussion is closely intertwined with problems of cultural specificity, social inequality, meritocracy and justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of science and education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.6.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education and happiness: strategies for achieving happiness in the context of educational policy

Anna Nikolaevna Zamoshchanskaya, Olga Sergeevna Gilyazova, Ivan I. Zamoshchansky
3 citations
Perspectives of science and education
Educational Innovations and Challenges
9.74
article

Education and happiness: strategies for achieving happiness in the context of educational policy

Anna Nikolaevna Zamoshchanskaya, Olga Sergeevna Gilyazova, Ivan I. Zamoshchansky
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The problem and the goal. The topic of the relationship between happiness (wellbeing) and education has been immanently present in theoretical (philosophical, political, religious) discourse and in pedagogical practice since antiquity. However, it owes its relevance, first of all, to the value shift from the values of survival to the values of self-expression and positive education, which, at the same time, contributed to a bias in the consideration of this topic: The emphasis on the pros of this relationship and underestimation of its cons. The intention to draw a more balanced picture sets the following aim of the article: to identify the main strategies for happiness achievement and consider them in the context of educational policy. Materials and methods. The theoretical and methodological background includes comparative and discourse analysis, philosophical reflection of the ideas of ancient thinkers and modern Russian and foreign experts in the field of education and happiness, and their connection. The adjusted version of D. Leontiev’s two-level hedoeudaimonic model of happiness serves as a theoretical framework. Results. Two main strategies for happiness achievement have been established – the upward game and the downward game, which the authors, proceeding from M. Joshanloo’s concept, correlate with culturebased concepts of happiness – individualistic (Western) and collectivistic (non-Western). Characteristics and outcomes of these strategies in closed, liberal and conservative educational systems are presented. The problem is that these strategies are implemented by educational systems in a primarily hedonic rather than eudaimonic way, which results in the frustrating nature of the first strategy and the discriminating (academically unsuccessful and/or low–income students) nature of the second. Conclusion. The happiness construct plays a multifaceted role as an ideological instrument of educational policy and, in turn, education plays an equally intricate role in fostering happiness. The topic under discussion is closely intertwined with problems of cultural specificity, social inequality, meritocracy and justice.

Perspectives of science and educationVol. 72(6)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
9.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.