What Are the Social Science Literacy Abilities of Junior High School Students After the Pandemic?

Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the impact of teacher learning on the social science literacy skills of post-pandemic junior high school students. Theoretical Framework: This research is crucial to elucidate the observed decline in students' science literacy proficiency over recent years. Method: The study used a Kirkpatrick design with four parts. It involved four junior high schools, 14 teachers, and 423 students. Data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, observations and tests. The data were analysed using a variety of techniques, including graphs. Results and discussion: Aiken's formula showed that the research questionnaire and literacy questions are highly suitable. The research questionnaire had a Cronbach Alpha value of 0.950, which is excellent, while the literacy questions had a value of 0.727, which is good. 95% of students achieved the reaction dimension, 91% achieved the learning dimension, 88% achieved the behaviour dimension, and 69% achieved the outcome dimension. The results show that 30.97% of students did not achieve proficiency in social science literacy after learning. This is important for Sustainable Development Goal 4, which is about making sure everyone has access to quality education and learning opportunities. More research is needed to gain a better understanding of this outcome. Research implications: This study contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive evaluation of social science literacy skills among post-pandemic junior high school students.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n01.pe02759
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Are the Social Science Literacy Abilities of Junior High School Students After the Pandemic?

Danarstuti Utami, Victor Novianto, Esti Setiawati, Siti Zumrotul Islamiyah et al.
1 citations
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
article

What Are the Social Science Literacy Abilities of Junior High School Students After the Pandemic?

Danarstuti Utami, Victor Novianto, Esti Setiawati, Siti Zumrotul Islamiyah, Sunarti Sunarti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the impact of teacher learning on the social science literacy skills of post-pandemic junior high school students. Theoretical Framework: This research is crucial to elucidate the observed decline in students' science literacy proficiency over recent years. Method: The study used a Kirkpatrick design with four parts. It involved four junior high schools, 14 teachers, and 423 students. Data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, observations and tests. The data were analysed using a variety of techniques, including graphs. Results and discussion: Aiken's formula showed that the research questionnaire and literacy questions are highly suitable. The research questionnaire had a Cronbach Alpha value of 0.950, which is excellent, while the literacy questions had a value of 0.727, which is good. 95% of students achieved the reaction dimension, 91% achieved the learning dimension, 88% achieved the behaviour dimension, and 69% achieved the outcome dimension. The results show that 30.97% of students did not achieve proficiency in social science literacy after learning. This is important for Sustainable Development Goal 4, which is about making sure everyone has access to quality education and learning opportunities. More research is needed to gain a better understanding of this outcome. Research implications: This study contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive evaluation of social science literacy skills among post-pandemic junior high school students.

Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs ReviewVol. 5(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.