FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ULTRA TRANSLUCENT ZIRCONIA VERSUS LITHIUM DISILICATE IMPLANT SUPPORTED HYBRID ABUTMENT CROWNS TO TI BASE (AN IN-VITRO STUDY)

Aim of the study: to construct implant supported titanium based hybrid abutment crown from traditional lithium disilicate block/ultratranslucent zirconia disc with the help of five axis milling machine and to compare the fracture resistance of the two material.Materials and methods: A total number of 24 (implant with titanium base abutment) samples were made and divided into two groups :The first group received ultra translucent zirconia hybrid abutment crown (Z), the second group received lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crown (L). All samples were exposed to a thermocycling and cyclic loading, to measure the strenght of the two materials crown samples were subjected to a static load in universal testing machine parallel to the long axis of the tooth using a metallic rod covered by aluminum foil to distribute the forces evenly till fracture of the specimen. The collected data were arranged in tabular form and statistically analysed.Results: Implant supported ultratranslucent zirconia hybrid abutment crown showed significant higher fracture resistance (939.72 ± 70.99) than those of lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crown (874.88 ± 40.45) with (65.83 ± 23.59) difference as P=0.01, the results of both crowns showed readings above the clinical acceptable range(300-400N)Conclusions: Ultratranslucent zirconia showed higher fracture resistance than lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crown.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Dental Journal /Egyptian Dental Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.331678.3245
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ULTRA TRANSLUCENT ZIRCONIA VERSUS LITHIUM DISILICATE IMPLANT SUPPORTED HYBRID ABUTMENT CROWNS TO TI BASE (AN IN-VITRO STUDY)

Hesham Alansary, Dina Magdy Abd El Naby, Hayat Ibrahim Mahrous El Banna
Egyptian Dental Journal /Egyptian Dental Journal
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ULTRA TRANSLUCENT ZIRCONIA VERSUS LITHIUM DISILICATE IMPLANT SUPPORTED HYBRID ABUTMENT CROWNS TO TI BASE (AN IN-VITRO STUDY)

Hesham Alansary, Dina Magdy Abd El Naby, Hayat Ibrahim Mahrous El Banna
article en

Abstract

Aim of the study: to construct implant supported titanium based hybrid abutment crown from traditional lithium disilicate block/ultratranslucent zirconia disc with the help of five axis milling machine and to compare the fracture resistance of the two material.Materials and methods: A total number of 24 (implant with titanium base abutment) samples were made and divided into two groups :The first group received ultra translucent zirconia hybrid abutment crown (Z), the second group received lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crown (L). All samples were exposed to a thermocycling and cyclic loading, to measure the strenght of the two materials crown samples were subjected to a static load in universal testing machine parallel to the long axis of the tooth using a metallic rod covered by aluminum foil to distribute the forces evenly till fracture of the specimen. The collected data were arranged in tabular form and statistically analysed.Results: Implant supported ultratranslucent zirconia hybrid abutment crown showed significant higher fracture resistance (939.72 ± 70.99) than those of lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crown (874.88 ± 40.45) with (65.83 ± 23.59) difference as P=0.01, the results of both crowns showed readings above the clinical acceptable range(300-400N)Conclusions: Ultratranslucent zirconia showed higher fracture resistance than lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crown.

Egyptian Dental Journal /Egyptian Dental JournalVol. 71(1)
Cairo University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.