Induction and Intubation Effects on Hemodynamic Response Using Slow Propofol or Ketamine- Slow Propofol Infusion in Dogs: An Experimental Study

Propofol is widely used in anesthetic induction in both human and veterinary medicine. However, it has hemodynamic adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia, particularly at rapid infusion rate. This study aimed to attenuate the hemodynamic changes during induction and investigate the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation using slow propofol or ketamine- slow propofol infusion in dogs. Eight dogs were assigned to two groups: Group1 received intravenous slow propofol 1 mg/kg/min for anesthesia induction and Group2 received intravenous ketamine bolus 2 mg/kg prior to slow propofol 1 mg/kg/min for anesthetic induction. The propofol infusion rate continued until achieving the appropriate conditions for intubation. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were measured 30 minutes after premedication (baseline), one minute after induction and intubation. The results showed that the propofol dose required for induction and intubation was significantly lower in Group 2 (1.55±0.37 mg/kg) than Group1 (3.56±0.44 mg/kg), with P = 0.01. After induction, Group 2 exhibited a sharp increase in heart rate (96.2 ±2.72a) compared to Group1 (60 ± 3.14c) with P < 0.001. Both groups showed non-significant changes in arterial blood pressure after induction. Meanwhile, Group 1 showed more variability and less stability in response to intubation. Also, it exhibited more significant fluctuations in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure levels after intubation. Group 2 maintained greater stability in arterial blood pressure in response to tracheal intubation. In conclusion and from the obtained results, slow propofol or ketamine- slow propofol combination were effective in mitigating hemodynamic fluctuations following induction. However, the ketamine-slow propofol combination achieved better stability in arterial pressure post-intubation than slow propofol alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zagazig Veterinary Journal/Zagazig Veterinary Journal (Online)
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/zvjz.2024.325288.1261
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Induction and Intubation Effects on Hemodynamic Response Using Slow Propofol or Ketamine- Slow Propofol Infusion in Dogs: An Experimental Study

Eslam F.M. Eisa, Bardees K. Elgohary, Hagar F. Gouda, Ali E. Kandeel et al.
Zagazig Veterinary Journal/Zagazig Veterinary Journal (Online)
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Induction and Intubation Effects on Hemodynamic Response Using Slow Propofol or Ketamine- Slow Propofol Infusion in Dogs: An Experimental Study

Eslam F.M. Eisa, Bardees K. Elgohary, Hagar F. Gouda, Ali E. Kandeel, Mahasen El-Shair
article en

Abstract

Propofol is widely used in anesthetic induction in both human and veterinary medicine. However, it has hemodynamic adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia, particularly at rapid infusion rate. This study aimed to attenuate the hemodynamic changes during induction and investigate the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation using slow propofol or ketamine- slow propofol infusion in dogs. Eight dogs were assigned to two groups: Group1 received intravenous slow propofol 1 mg/kg/min for anesthesia induction and Group2 received intravenous ketamine bolus 2 mg/kg prior to slow propofol 1 mg/kg/min for anesthetic induction. The propofol infusion rate continued until achieving the appropriate conditions for intubation. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were measured 30 minutes after premedication (baseline), one minute after induction and intubation. The results showed that the propofol dose required for induction and intubation was significantly lower in Group 2 (1.55±0.37 mg/kg) than Group1 (3.56±0.44 mg/kg), with P = 0.01. After induction, Group 2 exhibited a sharp increase in heart rate (96.2 ±2.72a) compared to Group1 (60 ± 3.14c) with P < 0.001. Both groups showed non-significant changes in arterial blood pressure after induction. Meanwhile, Group 1 showed more variability and less stability in response to intubation. Also, it exhibited more significant fluctuations in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure levels after intubation. Group 2 maintained greater stability in arterial blood pressure in response to tracheal intubation. In conclusion and from the obtained results, slow propofol or ketamine- slow propofol combination were effective in mitigating hemodynamic fluctuations following induction. However, the ketamine-slow propofol combination achieved better stability in arterial pressure post-intubation than slow propofol alone.

Zagazig Veterinary Journal/Zagazig Veterinary Journal (Online)Vol. 52(4)
Zagazig University (EG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Induction and Intubation Effects on Hemodynamic Response Using Slow Propofol or Ketamine- Slow Propofol Infusion in Dogs: An Experimental Study — Eslam F.M. Eisa, Bardees K. Elgohary, et al. · Zagazig Veterinary Journal/Zagazig Veterinary Journal (Online) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS