Preoperative Multi-slice Computed Tomography for Planning Abdominal Wall Plication in Abdominoplasty Patients with Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study

Background: Safe and effective abdominal wall plication is a crucial step in abdominoplasty for treating Diastasis of Rectus muscles (DR) repair. However, standardized preoperative tools for planning the actual plication amount are lacking, and always measured intraoperatively in a subjective way depending mainly on surgeon experience. So, it is important to search for an objective to standardize the amount of plication preoperative. Objective: This work aims to investigate the reliability of preoperative Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT) in predicting intraoperative plication measurements for DR repair during abdominoplasty.Patient and Methods: Preoperative MSCT scans measured DR in 13 female patients seeking abdominoplasty at three levels: midway between the xiphoid process and umbilicus (MW-XU), umbilical level (UL), and midway between the umbilicus and pubic symphysis (MW-US). During surgery, DR plication was performed based on a clinical assessment, and the actual plication amount was measured at the same three anatomical levels. Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and peak airway pressure (PAP) were monitored to avoid over or under plication. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group I, in which MSCT-calculated plication was equivalent to intraoperative plication (± 0.5 cm), and Group II, in which MSCT-calculated plication was less than intraoperative plication (difference >0.5 cm).Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the MSCT-calculated and intraoperative plication measurements in Group II (9 cases) (p<0.05 at all levels), while no significant differences were observed in Group I (4 cases) (p>0.05). All IAP and PAP measurements remained within safe limits (<12 mmHg) after plication. Seroma formation was the most common complication (30.77%).Conclusion: Although MSCT can be a helpful adjunct in preoperative planning, relying solely on MSCT-calculated plication measurements may be insufficient for guiding optimal surgical strategies. Surgeon experience and intraoperative assessment remain crucial for determining the appropriate amount of plication in abdominoplasty with DR repair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.297633.1103
Primary Topic
Body Contouring and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Multi-slice Computed Tomography for Planning Abdominal Wall Plication in Abdominoplasty Patients with Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study

Ahmed Elshahat, Mohamed Fathi, Mohamed Samir, Osama Shaban
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Body Contouring and Surgery
article

Preoperative Multi-slice Computed Tomography for Planning Abdominal Wall Plication in Abdominoplasty Patients with Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study

Ahmed Elshahat, Mohamed Fathi, Mohamed Samir, Osama Shaban
article en

Abstract

Background: Safe and effective abdominal wall plication is a crucial step in abdominoplasty for treating Diastasis of Rectus muscles (DR) repair. However, standardized preoperative tools for planning the actual plication amount are lacking, and always measured intraoperatively in a subjective way depending mainly on surgeon experience. So, it is important to search for an objective to standardize the amount of plication preoperative. Objective: This work aims to investigate the reliability of preoperative Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT) in predicting intraoperative plication measurements for DR repair during abdominoplasty.Patient and Methods: Preoperative MSCT scans measured DR in 13 female patients seeking abdominoplasty at three levels: midway between the xiphoid process and umbilicus (MW-XU), umbilical level (UL), and midway between the umbilicus and pubic symphysis (MW-US). During surgery, DR plication was performed based on a clinical assessment, and the actual plication amount was measured at the same three anatomical levels. Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and peak airway pressure (PAP) were monitored to avoid over or under plication. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group I, in which MSCT-calculated plication was equivalent to intraoperative plication (± 0.5 cm), and Group II, in which MSCT-calculated plication was less than intraoperative plication (difference >0.5 cm).Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the MSCT-calculated and intraoperative plication measurements in Group II (9 cases) (p<0.05 at all levels), while no significant differences were observed in Group I (4 cases) (p>0.05). All IAP and PAP measurements remained within safe limits (<12 mmHg) after plication. Seroma formation was the most common complication (30.77%).Conclusion: Although MSCT can be a helpful adjunct in preoperative planning, relying solely on MSCT-calculated plication measurements may be insufficient for guiding optimal surgical strategies. Surgeon experience and intraoperative assessment remain crucial for determining the appropriate amount of plication in abdominoplasty with DR repair.

The Egyptian Journal of SurgeryVol. 44(1)
Ain Shams University (EG), Nasser Institute hospital (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Body Contouring and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.