COMPARING CONTROLLED FLOW DELIVERY DENTAPEN® TECHNIQUE TO TRADITIONAL SYRINGES ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF ANESTHESIA AMONG A GROUP of PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives: To compare the effect of the controlled flow delivery Dentapen® technique to traditional syringes on pain perception during dental procedures among a group of pediatric dental patients.Methodology: A split-mouth study design was employed, involving twenty children aged 6-8 years who required Class I restorations on bilateral maxillary first primary molars. Participants' teeth were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Group A received infiltration injection technique using the Dentapen® technique on one maxillary primary first molar, while group B received traditional syringe-based infiltration anesthesia on the contralateral maxillary first primary molar. Pain perception during the procedure was evaluated using the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale, heart rate monitoring, and the Sound, Eyes, and Motor Scale. Parametric data (heart rate) were analyzed using paired t-tests, while non-parametric data were analyzed using the signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.Results: The Dentapen group exhibited significantly lower pain perception scores (2.80±1.51) compared to the traditional anesthesia group (7.50±0.89) (p<0.001). Both anesthesia methods resulted in a significant post-anesthesia increase in heart rate. However, traditional anesthesia induced a more significant increase (106.35±11.50) compared to Dentapen (p=0.006). Additionally, the Dentapen group exhibited significantly lower Sound, Eyes and Motor scores (1.30±0.66) compared to the traditional anesthesia group (2.80±0.41) (p<0.001).Conclusion: The Dentapen system can be effectively employed to reduce pain perception during restorative procedures on maxillary primary molars in children compared to traditional syringe techniques. The Dentapen group demonstrated significantly lower pain perception scores compared to the traditional syringe group during local anesthesia administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ahram Canadian Dental Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/acdj.2025.345302.1027
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARING CONTROLLED FLOW DELIVERY DENTAPEN® TECHNIQUE TO TRADITIONAL SYRINGES ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF ANESTHESIA AMONG A GROUP of PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Sherif Bahgat El Tawil, Shoaleh Shami, Reham Salman Al Shakhas
Ahram Canadian Dental Journal
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

COMPARING CONTROLLED FLOW DELIVERY DENTAPEN® TECHNIQUE TO TRADITIONAL SYRINGES ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF ANESTHESIA AMONG A GROUP of PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Sherif Bahgat El Tawil, Shoaleh Shami, Reham Salman Al Shakhas
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effect of the controlled flow delivery Dentapen® technique to traditional syringes on pain perception during dental procedures among a group of pediatric dental patients.Methodology: A split-mouth study design was employed, involving twenty children aged 6-8 years who required Class I restorations on bilateral maxillary first primary molars. Participants' teeth were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Group A received infiltration injection technique using the Dentapen® technique on one maxillary primary first molar, while group B received traditional syringe-based infiltration anesthesia on the contralateral maxillary first primary molar. Pain perception during the procedure was evaluated using the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale, heart rate monitoring, and the Sound, Eyes, and Motor Scale. Parametric data (heart rate) were analyzed using paired t-tests, while non-parametric data were analyzed using the signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.Results: The Dentapen group exhibited significantly lower pain perception scores (2.80±1.51) compared to the traditional anesthesia group (7.50±0.89) (p<0.001). Both anesthesia methods resulted in a significant post-anesthesia increase in heart rate. However, traditional anesthesia induced a more significant increase (106.35±11.50) compared to Dentapen (p=0.006). Additionally, the Dentapen group exhibited significantly lower Sound, Eyes and Motor scores (1.30±0.66) compared to the traditional anesthesia group (2.80±0.41) (p<0.001).Conclusion: The Dentapen system can be effectively employed to reduce pain perception during restorative procedures on maxillary primary molars in children compared to traditional syringe techniques. The Dentapen group demonstrated significantly lower pain perception scores compared to the traditional syringe group during local anesthesia administration.

Ahram Canadian Dental JournalVol. 4(1)
Cairo University (EG)
Ohio State University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.