Caudal to Cranial” Versus “Medial to Lateral” Approaches in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy, Retrospective comparative study

Background: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) has emerged as the gold standard for the management of colorectal cancer involving the right colon. To optimize surgical outcomes, various techniques have been developed and implemented. Objective: To compare the efficacy of medial-to-lateral and caudal-to-cranial approaches in LRH.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at General Surgery department, Ain Shams University Hospital on 60 patients who underwent LRH last 2 years between June 2021 to June 2023.Results: The mean surgical time of medial-lateral was about 134 minutes, while in caudal-cranial was about 143 minutes, which has no significant difference. The mean amount of blood loss during caudal-cranial technique was about 413 ml and about 414 ml with the medial-lateral technique, with no significant difference between them. The mean total harvested lymph nodes with caudal-cranial technique were about 22 lymph nodes, while medial-lateral technique was 17 lymph nodes with a significant preference for caudal to cranial technique. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was about 4 in both techniques. Postoperative hospital stay with both techniques showed no significant difference by the mean of 7 days. The mean wound healing time in both techniques was about 12 days.The mean percentage of postoperative leakage in caudal-cranial was about 3%, while it was about 6% in medial-lateral technique.The mean postoperative wound infection was 40% in caudal-cranial technique and about 33% with medial-lateral technique with no significant difference.Conclusion: Both medial-to-lateral and caudal-to-cranial approaches to LRH demonstrate comparable outcomes in terms of operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and wound healing.Caudal-to-cranial technique exhibited a higher lymph node yield, although the clinical significance of this finding remains uncertain. Further research is imperative to elucidate the optimal surgical approach for LRH and its impact on long-term patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.318472.1189
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caudal to Cranial” Versus “Medial to Lateral” Approaches in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy, Retrospective comparative study

Tarek Youssef, Moustafa M. Emad, Omar Abdel-Raouf Hanafi
The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Caudal to Cranial” Versus “Medial to Lateral” Approaches in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy, Retrospective comparative study

Tarek Youssef, Moustafa M. Emad, Omar Abdel-Raouf Hanafi
article en

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) has emerged as the gold standard for the management of colorectal cancer involving the right colon. To optimize surgical outcomes, various techniques have been developed and implemented. Objective: To compare the efficacy of medial-to-lateral and caudal-to-cranial approaches in LRH.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at General Surgery department, Ain Shams University Hospital on 60 patients who underwent LRH last 2 years between June 2021 to June 2023.Results: The mean surgical time of medial-lateral was about 134 minutes, while in caudal-cranial was about 143 minutes, which has no significant difference. The mean amount of blood loss during caudal-cranial technique was about 413 ml and about 414 ml with the medial-lateral technique, with no significant difference between them. The mean total harvested lymph nodes with caudal-cranial technique were about 22 lymph nodes, while medial-lateral technique was 17 lymph nodes with a significant preference for caudal to cranial technique. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was about 4 in both techniques. Postoperative hospital stay with both techniques showed no significant difference by the mean of 7 days. The mean wound healing time in both techniques was about 12 days.The mean percentage of postoperative leakage in caudal-cranial was about 3%, while it was about 6% in medial-lateral technique.The mean postoperative wound infection was 40% in caudal-cranial technique and about 33% with medial-lateral technique with no significant difference.Conclusion: Both medial-to-lateral and caudal-to-cranial approaches to LRH demonstrate comparable outcomes in terms of operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and wound healing.Caudal-to-cranial technique exhibited a higher lymph node yield, although the clinical significance of this finding remains uncertain. Further research is imperative to elucidate the optimal surgical approach for LRH and its impact on long-term patient outcomes.

The Egyptian Journal of SurgeryVol. 44(1)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Caudal to Cranial” Versus “Medial to Lateral” Approaches in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy, Retrospective comparative study — Tarek Youssef, Moustafa M. Emad, et al. · The Egyptian Journal of Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS