A080: The Comparative Efficacy of Different Mind-Body Exercises forFibromyalgia

<bold>Background:</bold> Medications often lead to adverse effects, mind-body exercise (MBE) therapy has become a more popular option for treating patients with fibromyalgia (FM). In recent studies MBE has been found to appear to be a more effective method for improving quality of life for FM patients; however, there are many different types of MBE and the most effective type of MBE therapy is not known. We, therefore, intent to compare the effects of different MBE types on improving the overall HRQOL and typical symptoms in patients with FM. <bold>Methods:</bold> A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing different MBEs versus usual care, placebo or active controls in patients with FM aged &gt;16 years were searched for in eight databases. A common comparator was identified between interventions to develop a network. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated between interventions. Direct and indirect evidence were pooled using the random effect models. Modified Cochrane‘s tool was used to assess risk of bias. (Registration number CRD42023467955) <bold>Results:</bold> 24 studies (n = 1447 participants) met the inclusion criteria. There was a high risk of bias on blinding. While dance was most effective for improving pain [SMD, -38.89; 95% CI, (-58.44, -19.34)], FIQ [SMD, -51.00; 95% CI, (-80.05, -21.95)]. Qigong was most effective for improving depression [SMD, -5.80; 95% CI, (-7.49, -4.11)]. MBSR was most effective for improving anxiety [SMD, -0.38; 95% CI, (-0.75, -0.00)]. Pilates was most effective for improving quality of life [SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, (-1.26, -0.10)]. None of the differences in sleep improvement were significant for any of the mind-body exercises. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Several MBEs were beneficial for FM. However, the effect size varied between interventions and outcomes. The results of this study may be used to guide the selection of the most effective MBEs according to the predominant symptom in individual patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.3.3.80.boisestate
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Training Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A080: The Comparative Efficacy of Different Mind-Body Exercises forFibromyalgia

Xiao Han, Yi Jia, Yifan Zhang, Ying Lv
International Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Physical Education and Training Studies
article

A080: The Comparative Efficacy of Different Mind-Body Exercises forFibromyalgia

Xiao Han, Yi Jia, Yifan Zhang, Ying Lv
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Medications often lead to adverse effects, mind-body exercise (MBE) therapy has become a more popular option for treating patients with fibromyalgia (FM). In recent studies MBE has been found to appear to be a more effective method for improving quality of life for FM patients; however, there are many different types of MBE and the most effective type of MBE therapy is not known. We, therefore, intent to compare the effects of different MBE types on improving the overall HRQOL and typical symptoms in patients with FM. <bold>Methods:</bold> A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing different MBEs versus usual care, placebo or active controls in patients with FM aged &gt;16 years were searched for in eight databases. A common comparator was identified between interventions to develop a network. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated between interventions. Direct and indirect evidence were pooled using the random effect models. Modified Cochrane‘s tool was used to assess risk of bias. (Registration number CRD42023467955) <bold>Results:</bold> 24 studies (n = 1447 participants) met the inclusion criteria. There was a high risk of bias on blinding. While dance was most effective for improving pain [SMD, -38.89; 95% CI, (-58.44, -19.34)], FIQ [SMD, -51.00; 95% CI, (-80.05, -21.95)]. Qigong was most effective for improving depression [SMD, -5.80; 95% CI, (-7.49, -4.11)]. MBSR was most effective for improving anxiety [SMD, -0.38; 95% CI, (-0.75, -0.00)]. Pilates was most effective for improving quality of life [SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, (-1.26, -0.10)]. None of the differences in sleep improvement were significant for any of the mind-body exercises. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Several MBEs were beneficial for FM. However, the effect size varied between interventions and outcomes. The results of this study may be used to guide the selection of the most effective MBEs according to the predominant symptom in individual patients.

International Journal of Physical Activity and HealthVol. 3(3)
North University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Physical Education and Training Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.