ΛCDM model against cosmography: a possible deviation after DESI 2024

ABSTRACT In this study, we present an analysis of the standard flat-$\Lambda$CDM (Lambda cold dark matter) model using a cosmographic approach, incorporating recent Dark Energy Survey Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) observations and Type Ia Supernova (SNIa) catalogues, including Dark Energy Survey Supernova 5 Year Release (DES-SN5YR) and Pantheon + compilations. We find full consistency between the standard model and the cosmographic approach when considering DESI BAO and SNIa catalogues independently. When combining DESI BAO with SNIa data, we examine the impact of the Planck prior on the sound horizon at the drag epoch, $r_d$, and the Cepheid prior on the absolute magnitude, M. Applying the Planck prior on $r_d$ alone yields an $H_0$ value consistent with the Planck measurement, while applying the Cepheid prior on M alone results in an $H_0$ value consistent with the SH0ES measurement. Without any priors, the $H_0$ value obtained has a large error margin, reconciling the Planck and SH0ES measurements. In all cases where individual priors are applied, we observe no significant tension between the flat-$\Lambda$CDM model and the cosmographic approach. However, when both Planck and Cepheid priors are applied simultaneously, significant tensions arise between the model and cosmography. This tension is even more pronounced when excluding LRG1 and LRG2 from the DESI measurements. These results indicate that the standard model cannot simultaneously reconcile high-redshift Planck cosmic microwave background observations and local Cepheid measurements. This discrepancy supports the possibility of new physics beyond the standard model or, alternatively, the presence of unrecognized systematic errors in the observational data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf037
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ΛCDM model against cosmography: a possible deviation after DESI 2024

Zahra Davari, M. Malekjani, Saeed Pourojaghi
13 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
15.01
article

ΛCDM model against cosmography: a possible deviation after DESI 2024

Zahra Davari, M. Malekjani, Saeed Pourojaghi
article en
13 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, we present an analysis of the standard flat-$\Lambda$CDM (Lambda cold dark matter) model using a cosmographic approach, incorporating recent Dark Energy Survey Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) observations and Type Ia Supernova (SNIa) catalogues, including Dark Energy Survey Supernova 5 Year Release (DES-SN5YR) and Pantheon + compilations. We find full consistency between the standard model and the cosmographic approach when considering DESI BAO and SNIa catalogues independently. When combining DESI BAO with SNIa data, we examine the impact of the Planck prior on the sound horizon at the drag epoch, $r_d$, and the Cepheid prior on the absolute magnitude, M. Applying the Planck prior on $r_d$ alone yields an $H_0$ value consistent with the Planck measurement, while applying the Cepheid prior on M alone results in an $H_0$ value consistent with the SH0ES measurement. Without any priors, the $H_0$ value obtained has a large error margin, reconciling the Planck and SH0ES measurements. In all cases where individual priors are applied, we observe no significant tension between the flat-$\Lambda$CDM model and the cosmographic approach. However, when both Planck and Cepheid priors are applied simultaneously, significant tensions arise between the model and cosmography. This tension is even more pronounced when excluding LRG1 and LRG2 from the DESI measurements. These results indicate that the standard model cannot simultaneously reconcile high-redshift Planck cosmic microwave background observations and local Cepheid measurements. This discrepancy supports the possibility of new physics beyond the standard model or, alternatively, the presence of unrecognized systematic errors in the observational data.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 537(1)
Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KR), Bu-Ali Sina University (IR)
National Science Foundation, Iran National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
15.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.