A Comparison Study on The Learning Scenarios in Physics Laboratory: Real Learning vs Virtual Learning

The Laboratory section plays a significant role in the Engineering Physics course.However, due to many challenges in the past few years, professors and laboratory instructors have to conduct these sessions virtually through online sessions.In this research, we evaluate the process of virtual learning and compare it to traditional learning sessions.We have conducted the study on the ohm's law experiment in the physics laboratory at Ajman University, involving 175 first year students.The grades and answers to questionnaires are analyzed in three datasets.The first dataset involved 59 students who conducted the experiment through a face-to-face laboratory under the supervision of the laboratory instructor (Real Learning).In the second dataset, 67 students performed the experiment virtually with the online supervision of a laboratory instructor (Virtual Learning).49 students are involved in the third dataset where instructions are given virtually to students, and then they conducted the experiment through the traditional face-to-face laboratory method (Virtual-Real Learning).The comparison showed that the third method VRL is the most significant method towards grades and understanding achievements, and the VR method showed the lowest performance.In addition, student feedback has also marked the VRL method as the most favorable scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evergreen
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5109/7326924
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison Study on The Learning Scenarios in Physics Laboratory: Real Learning vs Virtual Learning

Khaled M. Mohamed, Hanan S. Ibrahim, A. Haj Ismail, Atef Abdelkader et al.
Evergreen
Education and Learning Interventions
article

A Comparison Study on The Learning Scenarios in Physics Laboratory: Real Learning vs Virtual Learning

Khaled M. Mohamed, Hanan S. Ibrahim, A. Haj Ismail, Atef Abdelkader, Elmuez A. Dawi, O. Salem, A. A. Karar
article en

Abstract

The Laboratory section plays a significant role in the Engineering Physics course.However, due to many challenges in the past few years, professors and laboratory instructors have to conduct these sessions virtually through online sessions.In this research, we evaluate the process of virtual learning and compare it to traditional learning sessions.We have conducted the study on the ohm's law experiment in the physics laboratory at Ajman University, involving 175 first year students.The grades and answers to questionnaires are analyzed in three datasets.The first dataset involved 59 students who conducted the experiment through a face-to-face laboratory under the supervision of the laboratory instructor (Real Learning).In the second dataset, 67 students performed the experiment virtually with the online supervision of a laboratory instructor (Virtual Learning).49 students are involved in the third dataset where instructions are given virtually to students, and then they conducted the experiment through the traditional face-to-face laboratory method (Virtual-Real Learning).The comparison showed that the third method VRL is the most significant method towards grades and understanding achievements, and the VR method showed the lowest performance.In addition, student feedback has also marked the VRL method as the most favorable scenario.

EvergreenVol. 11(4)
University of Aleppo (SY), Ajman University (AE), Nile University (UG)
Ajman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.