Enhancing grassland cut detection using Sentinel-2 time series through integration of Sentinel-1 SAR and weather data

The detection of grassland cuts is relevant for modelling grassland yield and quality because information on cut dates and cut intensity aids in the modelling of the nutrient biomass ratio of fodder. This research improves an existing grassland cut detection methodology developed for Austria based on Sentinel-2 (S2) optical time series. To further improve the detection accuracy, the new method incorporates Sentinel-1 (S1) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and daily weather data utilizing a machine learning-based model (Catboost). Cuts are first identified through a threshold-based comparison between a fitted idealized grassland growth curve and the observed NDVI values. The Catboost model subsequently addresses limitations in S2 data caused by cloud cover and other sub-optimum observation conditions. The Catboost model (1) identifies missing cuts in periods with no S2 data, and (2) eliminates false positive cuts. Weather data is utilized to identify the start of the cutting season and to define the (minimum required) time span between two consecutive cuts. Results demonstrate an improvement in cut date f-score (from 0.77 to 0.81), a reduced false detection rate (from 0.21 to 0.16), and a slight decrease in mean absolute error between true and estimated cut dates (from 4.6 to 4.1). The improvement in the accuracy was more evident for plots with high mowing frequency, while some remaining false detections were evident for extensively managed grasslands. The incorporation of S1 SAR and weather data enables the cut detection for the entire calendar year and eliminates the need for fixed growing season start/end dates. However, S1 SAR data alone did not provide reliable detection accuracy, showing its limitations in depicting vegetation dynamics for grassland. Overall, the improvements in accuracy and flexibility demonstrate the efficacy of the enhanced methodology, emphasizing the potential of combining S1 and S2 with weather data in large scale and cost-efficient grassland monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101453
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing grassland cut detection using Sentinel-2 time series through integration of Sentinel-1 SAR and weather data

Clement Atzberger, Cody Watzig, Aleksandar Dujakovic, Andreas Schaumberger et al.
3 citations
Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
2.40
article

Enhancing grassland cut detection using Sentinel-2 time series through integration of Sentinel-1 SAR and weather data

Clement Atzberger, Cody Watzig, Aleksandar Dujakovic, Andreas Schaumberger, Francesco Vuolo, Andreas Klingler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The detection of grassland cuts is relevant for modelling grassland yield and quality because information on cut dates and cut intensity aids in the modelling of the nutrient biomass ratio of fodder. This research improves an existing grassland cut detection methodology developed for Austria based on Sentinel-2 (S2) optical time series. To further improve the detection accuracy, the new method incorporates Sentinel-1 (S1) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and daily weather data utilizing a machine learning-based model (Catboost). Cuts are first identified through a threshold-based comparison between a fitted idealized grassland growth curve and the observed NDVI values. The Catboost model subsequently addresses limitations in S2 data caused by cloud cover and other sub-optimum observation conditions. The Catboost model (1) identifies missing cuts in periods with no S2 data, and (2) eliminates false positive cuts. Weather data is utilized to identify the start of the cutting season and to define the (minimum required) time span between two consecutive cuts. Results demonstrate an improvement in cut date f-score (from 0.77 to 0.81), a reduced false detection rate (from 0.21 to 0.16), and a slight decrease in mean absolute error between true and estimated cut dates (from 4.6 to 4.1). The improvement in the accuracy was more evident for plots with high mowing frequency, while some remaining false detections were evident for extensively managed grasslands. The incorporation of S1 SAR and weather data enables the cut detection for the entire calendar year and eliminates the need for fixed growing season start/end dates. However, S1 SAR data alone did not provide reliable detection accuracy, showing its limitations in depicting vegetation dynamics for grassland. Overall, the improvements in accuracy and flexibility demonstrate the efficacy of the enhanced methodology, emphasizing the potential of combining S1 and S2 with weather data in large scale and cost-efficient grassland monitoring.

Remote Sensing Applications Society and EnvironmentVol. 37
HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein (AT), BOKU University (AT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.