Optimal Monitor Placement in Quantum Network Tomography

Monitoring the performance of internal network elements is crucial for network management and optimizing network operations. Quantum Network Tomography (QNT) focuses on the characterization of quantum channels through end-to-end measurements between selected subsets of network nodes. In this work, we examine optimal strategies for monitor placement in QNT. Our study specifically targets a four-node quantum star network in which links are modelled as depolarizing channels. We investigate QNT methods that utilize a single monitor in the four-node star network, and evaluate estimation performance for all possible monitor placements in the star network. We perform a theoretical analysis of the estimators by calculating the Quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM) and the Quantum Cramer-Rao Bound (QCRB). The QCRB provides a lower bound on the variance of any estimator, thereby offering a benchmark for their efficiency. We identify the monitor placement at the hub as a baseline to analyze the performance of end-to-end estimation given that the monitor has direct access to every link of the network. Through further investigation, we find that the best performance is achieved by placing the monitor in the leaf with the least noisy link for the 4- node star network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/qce60285.2024.10310
Primary Topic
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Monitor Placement in Quantum Network Tomography

Don Towsley, Nicola Marchetti, Matheus Guedes de Andrade, Indrakshi Dey et al.
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
article

Optimal Monitor Placement in Quantum Network Tomography

Don Towsley, Nicola Marchetti, Matheus Guedes de Andrade, Indrakshi Dey, Athira Kalavampara Raghunadhan, Daniel Kilperl
article en

Abstract

Monitoring the performance of internal network elements is crucial for network management and optimizing network operations. Quantum Network Tomography (QNT) focuses on the characterization of quantum channels through end-to-end measurements between selected subsets of network nodes. In this work, we examine optimal strategies for monitor placement in QNT. Our study specifically targets a four-node quantum star network in which links are modelled as depolarizing channels. We investigate QNT methods that utilize a single monitor in the four-node star network, and evaluate estimation performance for all possible monitor placements in the star network. We perform a theoretical analysis of the estimators by calculating the Quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM) and the Quantum Cramer-Rao Bound (QCRB). The QCRB provides a lower bound on the variance of any estimator, thereby offering a benchmark for their efficiency. We identify the monitor placement at the hub as a baseline to analyze the performance of end-to-end estimation given that the monitor has direct access to every link of the network. Through further investigation, we find that the best performance is achieved by placing the monitor in the leaf with the least noisy link for the 4- node star network.

Amherst College (US), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Munster Technological University (IE), South East Technological University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimal Monitor Placement in Quantum Network Tomography — Don Towsley, Nicola Marchetti, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS