Estimation of Leaf Area Index Using Radiative Transfer Process-Guided Deep Learning

The leaf area index (LAI) serves as a significant vegetation growth indicator and plays an essential role in vegetation's feedback to climate change. Currently, artificial intelligence (e.g., deep learning) algorithms possess strong capabilities in constructing complex relationships and demonstrate successful integration with remote sensing for LAI inversion. Among these algorithms, the long short-term memory (LSTM) network excels in handling sequence data and features a multi-layer nonlinear structure that effectively captures complex nonlinear relationships between vegetation canopy reflectance and LAI. However, previous researches mainly relied on the strong learning capabilities of LSTM without incorporating essential remote sensing knowledge, which led to the lack of process information guidance in the training stage. Consequently, the performance of the trained model may be significantly limited. In this letter, we proposed a process-guided LSTM (LSTM-PG) deep learning method for LAI estimation by integrating radiative transfer models. The constrained training dataset was generated using the Soil-Leaf-Canopy (SLC) model. We separately utilized the loss function of mean squared error (MSE) and a process-guided loss function to generate LSTM models for LAI predictions from the simulated SLC datasets. Subsequently, we validated the accuracy of the LAI retrieval models using field measurements from the ImagineS project. Our results indicated that the proposed process-guided (PG) method (R² = 0.79, RMSE = 0.87) performed better than the LSTM-MSE estimations (R² = 0.79, RMSE = 0.93). Additionally, statistical analyses across various scenarios demonstrated significant advantages of the proposed method, and the LSTM-PG predictions showed good spatial consistency with the LAI reference maps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lgrs.2025.3528181
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of Leaf Area Index Using Radiative Transfer Process-Guided Deep Learning

Xiao Ma, Huaan Jin, Yuting Qiao, Li Gao et al.
2 citations
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
3.50
article

Estimation of Leaf Area Index Using Radiative Transfer Process-Guided Deep Learning

Xiao Ma, Huaan Jin, Yuting Qiao, Li Gao, R. An, Zhouyang Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The leaf area index (LAI) serves as a significant vegetation growth indicator and plays an essential role in vegetation's feedback to climate change. Currently, artificial intelligence (e.g., deep learning) algorithms possess strong capabilities in constructing complex relationships and demonstrate successful integration with remote sensing for LAI inversion. Among these algorithms, the long short-term memory (LSTM) network excels in handling sequence data and features a multi-layer nonlinear structure that effectively captures complex nonlinear relationships between vegetation canopy reflectance and LAI. However, previous researches mainly relied on the strong learning capabilities of LSTM without incorporating essential remote sensing knowledge, which led to the lack of process information guidance in the training stage. Consequently, the performance of the trained model may be significantly limited. In this letter, we proposed a process-guided LSTM (LSTM-PG) deep learning method for LAI estimation by integrating radiative transfer models. The constrained training dataset was generated using the Soil-Leaf-Canopy (SLC) model. We separately utilized the loss function of mean squared error (MSE) and a process-guided loss function to generate LSTM models for LAI predictions from the simulated SLC datasets. Subsequently, we validated the accuracy of the LAI retrieval models using field measurements from the ImagineS project. Our results indicated that the proposed process-guided (PG) method (R² = 0.79, RMSE = 0.87) performed better than the LSTM-MSE estimations (R² = 0.79, RMSE = 0.93). Additionally, statistical analyses across various scenarios demonstrated significant advantages of the proposed method, and the LSTM-PG predictions showed good spatial consistency with the LAI reference maps.

IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersVol. 22
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.