Can baby universe absorption explain dark energy?

It has been proposed that the accelerated expansion of the Universe can be explained by the merging of our Universe with baby universes, resulting in dark energy with a phantomlike equation of state. However, the evidence in favor of it did not include the full set of cosmological observables. Here we examine the implications of this model for both early and late universe cosmology using data from Planck collaboration, DESI 2024 and other experiments. We find that the pure baby universe model gives a poor fit to current data. Extending it to include a contribution from the cosmological constant, we find two allowed regions of parameter space: one close to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi><a:mi>CDM</a:mi></a:math>, and another with <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</d:mi><d:mo>&lt;</d:mo><d:mn>0</d:mn></d:math> plus the exotic dark energy component. The two regions can be significantly favored over <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi><g:mi>CDM</g:mi></g:math>, depending on the choice of supernova datasets, and they can ameliorate the Hubble tension to the level of <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mn>2</j:mn><j:mi>σ</j:mi></j:math>, depending on the supernova dataset. The model with <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</l:mi><l:mo>&lt;</l:mo><l:mn>0</l:mn></l:math> features an equation of state <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>w</o:mi><o:mo stretchy="false">(</o:mo><o:mi>a</o:mi><o:mo stretchy="false">)</o:mo></o:math> with a pole singularity at early times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.023516
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can baby universe absorption explain dark energy?

James M. Cline, Varun Muralidharan
5 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
5.77
article

Can baby universe absorption explain dark energy?

James M. Cline, Varun Muralidharan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

It has been proposed that the accelerated expansion of the Universe can be explained by the merging of our Universe with baby universes, resulting in dark energy with a phantomlike equation of state. However, the evidence in favor of it did not include the full set of cosmological observables. Here we examine the implications of this model for both early and late universe cosmology using data from Planck collaboration, DESI 2024 and other experiments. We find that the pure baby universe model gives a poor fit to current data. Extending it to include a contribution from the cosmological constant, we find two allowed regions of parameter space: one close to <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi><a:mi>CDM</a:mi></a:math>, and another with <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</d:mi><d:mo>&lt;</d:mo><d:mn>0</d:mn></d:math> plus the exotic dark energy component. The two regions can be significantly favored over <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi><g:mi>CDM</g:mi></g:math>, depending on the choice of supernova datasets, and they can ameliorate the Hubble tension to the level of <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mn>2</j:mn><j:mi>σ</j:mi></j:math>, depending on the supernova dataset. The model with <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</l:mi><l:mo>&lt;</l:mo><l:mn>0</l:mn></l:math> features an equation of state <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>w</o:mi><o:mo stretchy="false">(</o:mo><o:mi>a</o:mi><o:mo stretchy="false">)</o:mo></o:math> with a pole singularity at early times.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(2)
McGill University (CA), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
CERN, Mitacs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.