Development of Sci‐Tech Journals in China Stimulated by the China Sci‐Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan

ABSTRACT This study aims to evaluate the influence of the China Sci‐Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan (CJEAP) on the development of Chinese science and technology (sci‐tech) journals. The performance of bibliometric indicators of these journals before and after the implementation of this plan is examined. In particular, a discipline richness algorithm is employed to evaluate whether and how the funding plan affected the disciplinal coverage of publications. The results show that the influence of CJEAP funding in sci‐tech journals published in China is not evenly distributed. Highly funded journals appear to have expanded both the range of research areas and disciplines, and the article volume, while poorly funded journals mainly focus on attracting manuscripts with higher scientific impact but display less expanded disciplinal range. New journals funded by CJEAP are characterised with high scientific levels focusing on highly sophisticated fields, but initially featuring a relatively small article volume. Notably, a positive relationship exists between the international collaboration rate and citation ranking score, and thus the expansion of article volume with manuscripts mainly from Chinese scholars may not be conducive for enhancing the international influence of journals published in China. In summary, our results indicate that CJEAP funding has elicited powerful influence in promoting sci‐tech journals published in China, suggesting continuous funding support should be both necessary and efficient for further promoting the development of sci‐tech journals published in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learned Publishing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1654
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Sci‐Tech Journals in China Stimulated by the China Sci‐Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan

Yaping Li, Chuwei Li, Zuoqi Ding
Learned Publishing
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Development of Sci‐Tech Journals in China Stimulated by the China Sci‐Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan

Yaping Li, Chuwei Li, Zuoqi Ding
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to evaluate the influence of the China Sci‐Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan (CJEAP) on the development of Chinese science and technology (sci‐tech) journals. The performance of bibliometric indicators of these journals before and after the implementation of this plan is examined. In particular, a discipline richness algorithm is employed to evaluate whether and how the funding plan affected the disciplinal coverage of publications. The results show that the influence of CJEAP funding in sci‐tech journals published in China is not evenly distributed. Highly funded journals appear to have expanded both the range of research areas and disciplines, and the article volume, while poorly funded journals mainly focus on attracting manuscripts with higher scientific impact but display less expanded disciplinal range. New journals funded by CJEAP are characterised with high scientific levels focusing on highly sophisticated fields, but initially featuring a relatively small article volume. Notably, a positive relationship exists between the international collaboration rate and citation ranking score, and thus the expansion of article volume with manuscripts mainly from Chinese scholars may not be conducive for enhancing the international influence of journals published in China. In summary, our results indicate that CJEAP funding has elicited powerful influence in promoting sci‐tech journals published in China, suggesting continuous funding support should be both necessary and efficient for further promoting the development of sci‐tech journals published in China.

Learned PublishingVol. 38(1)
China Pharmaceutical University (CN)
China Association for Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Government of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education, Chinese Academy of Engineering
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.