Disciplinary Distinctions and Pedagogical Considerations of Teaching Psychology in Indian Academia

A student of Psychology often begins their journey with a query of whether Psychology should be defined as a Science or Humanities subject. Besides categorization, or the degree definitions, the question deserves deeper exploration in terms of how to discover the subject, for the novice learner. Would the rigour of research in the physical sciences, and hard-core quantitative analyses be the primary criteria of deciding whether a subject or discipline be defined as a Science? Or would depth of explanation, and more eclectic approaches be amenable to exploring for more knowledge, qualitatively and quantitatively? Linked to this distinction is the approach to teaching and learning the subject at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The listing of Psychology as a subject/ domain of study varies from Science and Technology, to Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences faculties across higher education institutions in India (and abroad). The pedagogy of teaching Psychology appears to vary as well, typically most including theoretical concepts and applications beyond the classroom. The question most interesting perhaps is whether it need be restricted to any specific faculty at all, especially in postgraduate level, but rather engage a more multidisciplinary avenue. The present paper aims to raise these questions for more reflections on teaching-learning practices in Psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Indian Psychology
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25215/1203.130
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disciplinary Distinctions and Pedagogical Considerations of Teaching Psychology in Indian Academia

Moumita Mukherjee
International Journal of Indian Psychology
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
article

Disciplinary Distinctions and Pedagogical Considerations of Teaching Psychology in Indian Academia

Moumita Mukherjee
article en

Abstract

A student of Psychology often begins their journey with a query of whether Psychology should be defined as a Science or Humanities subject. Besides categorization, or the degree definitions, the question deserves deeper exploration in terms of how to discover the subject, for the novice learner. Would the rigour of research in the physical sciences, and hard-core quantitative analyses be the primary criteria of deciding whether a subject or discipline be defined as a Science? Or would depth of explanation, and more eclectic approaches be amenable to exploring for more knowledge, qualitatively and quantitatively? Linked to this distinction is the approach to teaching and learning the subject at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The listing of Psychology as a subject/ domain of study varies from Science and Technology, to Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences faculties across higher education institutions in India (and abroad). The pedagogy of teaching Psychology appears to vary as well, typically most including theoretical concepts and applications beyond the classroom. The question most interesting perhaps is whether it need be restricted to any specific faculty at all, especially in postgraduate level, but rather engage a more multidisciplinary avenue. The present paper aims to raise these questions for more reflections on teaching-learning practices in Psychology.

International Journal of Indian Psychology
St Xavier’s College (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.