Analyzing Atomic Interactions in Molecules as Learned by Neural Networks

While machine learning (ML) models have been able to achieve unprecedented accuracies across various prediction tasks in quantum chemistry, it is now apparent that accuracy on a test set alone is not a guarantee for robust chemical modeling such as stable molecular dynamics (MD). To go beyond accuracy, we use explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to develop a general analysis framework for atomic interactions and apply it to the SchNet and PaiNN neural network models. We compare these interactions with a set of fundamental chemical principles to understand how well the models have learned the underlying physicochemical concepts from the data. We focus on the strength of the interactions for different atomic species, how predictions for intensive and extensive quantum molecular properties are made, and analyze the decay and many-body nature of the interactions with interatomic distance. Models that deviate too far from known physical principles produce unstable MD trajectories, even when they have very high energy and force prediction accuracy. We also suggest further improvements to the ML architectures to better account for the polynomial decay of atomic interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01424
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Atomic Interactions in Molecules as Learned by Neural Networks

Malte Esders, Grégoire Montavon, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Thomas Schnake et al.
10 citations
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Machine Learning in Materials Science
5.18
article

Analyzing Atomic Interactions in Molecules as Learned by Neural Networks

Malte Esders, Grégoire Montavon, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Thomas Schnake, Jonas Lederer, Adil Kabylda, K. Müller
article en
10 citations

Abstract

While machine learning (ML) models have been able to achieve unprecedented accuracies across various prediction tasks in quantum chemistry, it is now apparent that accuracy on a test set alone is not a guarantee for robust chemical modeling such as stable molecular dynamics (MD). To go beyond accuracy, we use explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to develop a general analysis framework for atomic interactions and apply it to the SchNet and PaiNN neural network models. We compare these interactions with a set of fundamental chemical principles to understand how well the models have learned the underlying physicochemical concepts from the data. We focus on the strength of the interactions for different atomic species, how predictions for intensive and extensive quantum molecular properties are made, and analyze the decay and many-body nature of the interactions with interatomic distance. Models that deviate too far from known physical principles produce unstable MD trajectories, even when they have very high energy and force prediction accuracy. We also suggest further improvements to the ML architectures to better account for the polynomial decay of atomic interactions.

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 21(2)
University of Luxembourg (LU), Korea University (KR), Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Korea University, Technische Universität Berlin, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, European Research Council, Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
5.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.