Environmental performance of second-life lithium-ion batteries repurposed from electric vehicles for household storage systems

Repurposing lithium-ion batteries for stationary storage systems has emerged as a promising solution to address the rising number of end-of-life batteries and reduce the demand for new batteries for energy storage systems. While previous research has provided valuable insights into the environmental benefits of battery repurposing, there is still a need to examine the repurposing process more thoroughly, in order to make well-informed decisions on the implementation of second-life battery storage systems. Therefore, this study examines the influence of different repurposing strategies on the environmental performance of second-life battery energy storage systems. A life cycle assessment was conducted, analysing four repurposing cases relating to the exchange of components, namely i) new battery management system and module casing (Base case), ii) new battery management system and reuse of module casing (Case 1), iii) new module casing and reuse of battery management system (Case 2) and iv) reuse of module casing and battery management system (Case 3). These impacts were compared to a storage system using new batteries, to determine the potential environmental benefits and identify the most suitable repurposing strategy. Our findings demonstrate significant environmental benefits of second-life battery energy storage systems across various impact categories and repurposing cases. The Base case and Case 1 resulted in environmental benefits across all impact categories. The highest benefits were observed for metal depletion with savings of 58 % and 61 %, respectively. Increased savings were obtained for Case 2 and Case 3. However, environmental drawbacks were identified for freshwater and marine ecotoxicity. In particular, Case 2 resulted in the highest drawbacks of −22 % and − 16 %, respectively. These can be attributed to the allocation procedure, particularly affecting the recycling credits of battery management system recycling. Fully allocating the end-of-life impacts, and therefore the recycling credits to the second-life battery not only substantially increased all savings, but also transformed impact categories that initially showed drawbacks into those achieving the highest environmental savings. This study demonstrates the importance of carefully selecting repurposing strategies for second-life energy storage systems to maximize their environmental benefits and avoid drawbacks. Additionally, the results highlight the substantial influence of allocation procedures on overall environmental impacts, underscoring the need for clearer guidance on addressing the multifunctionality of repurposed batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.003
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental performance of second-life lithium-ion batteries repurposed from electric vehicles for household storage systems

Aleksander Jandric, Florian Part, Stefanie Prenner, Ricardo Gabbay de Souza et al.
15 citations
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Extraction and Separation Processes
10.70
article

Environmental performance of second-life lithium-ion batteries repurposed from electric vehicles for household storage systems

Aleksander Jandric, Florian Part, Stefanie Prenner, Ricardo Gabbay de Souza, Anna Spindlegger, Lyubov Slotyuk
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Repurposing lithium-ion batteries for stationary storage systems has emerged as a promising solution to address the rising number of end-of-life batteries and reduce the demand for new batteries for energy storage systems. While previous research has provided valuable insights into the environmental benefits of battery repurposing, there is still a need to examine the repurposing process more thoroughly, in order to make well-informed decisions on the implementation of second-life battery storage systems. Therefore, this study examines the influence of different repurposing strategies on the environmental performance of second-life battery energy storage systems. A life cycle assessment was conducted, analysing four repurposing cases relating to the exchange of components, namely i) new battery management system and module casing (Base case), ii) new battery management system and reuse of module casing (Case 1), iii) new module casing and reuse of battery management system (Case 2) and iv) reuse of module casing and battery management system (Case 3). These impacts were compared to a storage system using new batteries, to determine the potential environmental benefits and identify the most suitable repurposing strategy. Our findings demonstrate significant environmental benefits of second-life battery energy storage systems across various impact categories and repurposing cases. The Base case and Case 1 resulted in environmental benefits across all impact categories. The highest benefits were observed for metal depletion with savings of 58 % and 61 %, respectively. Increased savings were obtained for Case 2 and Case 3. However, environmental drawbacks were identified for freshwater and marine ecotoxicity. In particular, Case 2 resulted in the highest drawbacks of −22 % and − 16 %, respectively. These can be attributed to the allocation procedure, particularly affecting the recycling credits of battery management system recycling. Fully allocating the end-of-life impacts, and therefore the recycling credits to the second-life battery not only substantially increased all savings, but also transformed impact categories that initially showed drawbacks into those achieving the highest environmental savings. This study demonstrates the importance of carefully selecting repurposing strategies for second-life energy storage systems to maximize their environmental benefits and avoid drawbacks. Additionally, the results highlight the substantial influence of allocation procedures on overall environmental impacts, underscoring the need for clearer guidance on addressing the multifunctionality of repurposed batteries.

Sustainable Production and ConsumptionVol. 54
Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE), Brimatech (Austria) (AT), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR), BOKU University (AT), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -Prüfung, Bundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Extraction and Separation Processes
10.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.