To Share or Not to Share: Centering Individual Perspectives in Shared Leadership

Extant research in shared leadership has generally demonstrated a positive impact on team processes and effectiveness. However, the literature to date has largely failed to examine the individual level processes inherent in shared leadership, thereby neglecting the perspectives of individual team members. Moreover, extant research has also largely overlooked the potential dark sides of shared leadership. To address these limitations, we integrate job demands-resources theory and appraisal-based theories of stress to develop a conceptual framework that centers the individual team members in the shared leadership process. We suggest that shared leadership creates conditions that present a range of job demands for individual team members, and that their individual differences impact how team members appraise those job demands. Further, we suggest that appraisals of shared leadership demands by individual team members may influence their engagement in relational job crafting, as well as impact their individual effectiveness, which when accumulated over time, could impact the dynamic evolution of team-level shared leadership structures as well as team effectiveness. Lastly, we highlight how team members who repeatedly experience shared leadership demands as a hindrance could be at a potential risk of burnout. Through our conceptual framework, we lay the groundwork to enable future researchers to center individual team members in their theoretical and empirical explorations into shared leadership. In addition to our framework, we outline future research directions to expand our conceptual model and provide methodological guidance to empirically examine the theoretical perspectives that we have developed in this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241312253
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Share or Not to Share: Centering Individual Perspectives in Shared Leadership

Cynthia K. Maupin, Anwesha Choudhury
3 citations
Group & Organization Management
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
8.29
article

To Share or Not to Share: Centering Individual Perspectives in Shared Leadership

Cynthia K. Maupin, Anwesha Choudhury
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Extant research in shared leadership has generally demonstrated a positive impact on team processes and effectiveness. However, the literature to date has largely failed to examine the individual level processes inherent in shared leadership, thereby neglecting the perspectives of individual team members. Moreover, extant research has also largely overlooked the potential dark sides of shared leadership. To address these limitations, we integrate job demands-resources theory and appraisal-based theories of stress to develop a conceptual framework that centers the individual team members in the shared leadership process. We suggest that shared leadership creates conditions that present a range of job demands for individual team members, and that their individual differences impact how team members appraise those job demands. Further, we suggest that appraisals of shared leadership demands by individual team members may influence their engagement in relational job crafting, as well as impact their individual effectiveness, which when accumulated over time, could impact the dynamic evolution of team-level shared leadership structures as well as team effectiveness. Lastly, we highlight how team members who repeatedly experience shared leadership demands as a hindrance could be at a potential risk of burnout. Through our conceptual framework, we lay the groundwork to enable future researchers to center individual team members in their theoretical and empirical explorations into shared leadership. In addition to our framework, we outline future research directions to expand our conceptual model and provide methodological guidance to empirically examine the theoretical perspectives that we have developed in this paper.

Group & Organization ManagementVol. 50(2)
California State University Los Angeles (US), University of Mississippi (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.