Source-resolved black carbon and PM2.5 exposures during wildfires and prescribed burns
Changes in climate and land-use have significantly increased both the frequency and intensity of wildland fires globally, exacerbating the potential for hazardous impacts on human health. A better understanding of particle exposure concentrations and scenarios is crucial for developing mitigation strategies to reduce the health risks. Here, PM<sub>2.5</sub> and black carbon (BC) concentrations were monitored during wildland fires between 2022 and 2024, in fire-prone areas in Catalonia (NE Spain), by means of personal monitors (AirBeam2 and Micro-aethalometers AE51 and MA200). Results revealed that exposures to combustion aerosols (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and BC) were significant and comparable during wildfires and prescribed burns (mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> during wildfires = 152 μg/m<sup>3</sup> vs. 110-145 μg/m<sup>3</sup> for prescribed burns). Overall, BC/PM<sub>2.5</sub> ratios showed a large variability as a function of the monitoring scenario, indicating varying contributions from mineral aerosols to the emissions mix originating from fire management and extinction tasks. Specifically, mop-up tasks (final extinction tasks involving stirring top soil using handheld tools) were identified as a significant contributor to PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures, with 1-min PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak concentrations reaching up to 1190 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. These results may be especially valuable for emissions modelling. Source apportionment of multi-wavelength BC datasets provided deeper insights into emissions and their impact on exposure profiles: line operators (who control the fire perimeter) were predominantly exposed to biomass burning smoke BC<sub>bb</sub> (61%) when compared to BC from fossil-fuel combustion (BC<sub>ff</sub> = 39%), while torchers (in charge of initiating technical fires using fossil-fuel drip-torches) were predominantly exposed to BC<sub>ff</sub> (77% vs. 23% BC<sub>bb</sub>). These findings highlight the value of portable monitors in the assessment of wildfire emissions and impacts on human exposure and environment. The combination of these tools, reporting data in real-time and with high time-resolution, is key to the design and implementation of effective mitigation strategies for environmental and health concerns related to wildland fires.
Authors
- Aina Main-Nadal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6258-2654)
- Mar Viana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4073-3802)
- Barend L. van Drooge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6434-3390)
- Jordina Gili
Institutions
- Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environmental Pollution
- Published
- 2025-01-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125660
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.40
Funders
- Fundación Carmen y Severo Ochoa
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
- Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca