Criminological Insights Into Recidivism Trends in Croatia

This study provides an analysis of recidivism trends within Croatia's criminal justice system, offering a comprehensive overview of the concept. It explores various forms of recidivism—such as rearrest, reconviction, and reimprisonment—while underscoring the ambiguity surrounding its definition. Additionally, the study examines key challenges associated with accurately measuring recidivism. Recidivism, while often broadly defined as a return to criminal behaviour, poses significant challenges in terms of operationalisation and consistency across different contexts. The research highlights these challenges and focuses on Croatia’s specific approach to recidivism, where the term remains legally undefined, and there are no established measurement methods, with terminology often used without methodological explanation. Using quantitative data from the Croatian Bureau of Statistics, qualitative insights from an expert at the Diagnostic Centre within the prison system, and prison reports from 2011 to 2023, this study examines trends in reoffending. It further explores how recidivism has been measured and interpreted within the prison system over this period. It explores key findings related to recidivism trends, particularly the steady decline in previously convicted offenders and the significance of property crimes within recidivism categories. The study addresses both normative definitions and criminological perspectives to provide a clearer understanding of recidivism in Croatia by highlighting a significant gap: there is no clear definition of recidivism in Croatian legislation. This ambiguity not only complicates the understanding of recidivism within Croatia but also mirrors similar situations in neighbouring countries. Even when recidivism is defined in legal texts, the interpretation relies heavily on state discretion, making it impossible to compare data—despite data collection efforts—with other countries. The study underscores the necessity of evaluating rehabilitation programs, which is a prerequisite for enhancing the effectiveness of reintegration and rehabilitation efforts.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47152/prisonlife2024.41
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminological Insights Into Recidivism Trends in Croatia

Lea Feuerbach
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Criminological Insights Into Recidivism Trends in Croatia

Lea Feuerbach
article en

Abstract

This study provides an analysis of recidivism trends within Croatia's criminal justice system, offering a comprehensive overview of the concept. It explores various forms of recidivism—such as rearrest, reconviction, and reimprisonment—while underscoring the ambiguity surrounding its definition. Additionally, the study examines key challenges associated with accurately measuring recidivism. Recidivism, while often broadly defined as a return to criminal behaviour, poses significant challenges in terms of operationalisation and consistency across different contexts. The research highlights these challenges and focuses on Croatia’s specific approach to recidivism, where the term remains legally undefined, and there are no established measurement methods, with terminology often used without methodological explanation. Using quantitative data from the Croatian Bureau of Statistics, qualitative insights from an expert at the Diagnostic Centre within the prison system, and prison reports from 2011 to 2023, this study examines trends in reoffending. It further explores how recidivism has been measured and interpreted within the prison system over this period. It explores key findings related to recidivism trends, particularly the steady decline in previously convicted offenders and the significance of property crimes within recidivism categories. The study addresses both normative definitions and criminological perspectives to provide a clearer understanding of recidivism in Croatia by highlighting a significant gap: there is no clear definition of recidivism in Croatian legislation. This ambiguity not only complicates the understanding of recidivism within Croatia but also mirrors similar situations in neighbouring countries. Even when recidivism is defined in legal texts, the interpretation relies heavily on state discretion, making it impossible to compare data—despite data collection efforts—with other countries. The study underscores the necessity of evaluating rehabilitation programs, which is a prerequisite for enhancing the effectiveness of reintegration and rehabilitation efforts.

Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.