Crafting the legal regime for ecological environmental damage compensation: an analysis of China’s approach

In the past decade, China has initiated reforms promoting ecological civilization and a new era of environmental governance. The Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation (EEDC) Regime, a vital component of these reforms, is endorsed by the central government and the Communist Party of China (CPC). Relying on Article 9 of China’s Constitution, which emphasizes state ownership, the state ownership of natural resources in China is argued to be of public power nature, constitutionally empowering the state to manage natural resources reasonably. This article delves into the legal nature of the EEDC Regime, highlighting its role as a public law mechanism for ecological restoration. The presence of ecological environmental compensation clauses in China’s Civil Code is considered ‘inappropriate’. This article suggests that China should utilize the opportunity to include the EEDC Regime in the Environmental Code, formalizing its place in the legal framework dedicated to environmental preservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/apjel.2024.02.01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crafting the legal regime for ecological environmental damage compensation: an analysis of China’s approach

Hao Shen
1 citations
Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law
Environmental law and policy
4.07
article

Crafting the legal regime for ecological environmental damage compensation: an analysis of China’s approach

Hao Shen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the past decade, China has initiated reforms promoting ecological civilization and a new era of environmental governance. The Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation (EEDC) Regime, a vital component of these reforms, is endorsed by the central government and the Communist Party of China (CPC). Relying on Article 9 of China’s Constitution, which emphasizes state ownership, the state ownership of natural resources in China is argued to be of public power nature, constitutionally empowering the state to manage natural resources reasonably. This article delves into the legal nature of the EEDC Regime, highlighting its role as a public law mechanism for ecological restoration. The presence of ecological environmental compensation clauses in China’s Civil Code is considered ‘inappropriate’. This article suggests that China should utilize the opportunity to include the EEDC Regime in the Environmental Code, formalizing its place in the legal framework dedicated to environmental preservation.

Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental LawVol. 27(2)
Fudan University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental law and policy
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crafting the legal regime for ecological environmental damage compensation: an analysis of China’s approach — Hao Shen · Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS