Framing Indian federalism

This article focuses on a set of historical and contemporary developments in Indian constitutionalism that implicate the question of democracy and the question of federalism. Its goal is to connect the design and application of federal powers with what many regard as an important telos of federalism, namely, the promotion of democracy. Towards this end, it holds up for consideration India’s federal model, which, it is suggested, focuses on the presence of a subnational demos rather than the political identity of subnational units. Such an understanding of federalism de-emphasizes the territorial aspect of federalism and allows federal design to accommodate different kinds of cultural and ethnic realities. This vision proceeds on the premise that the more layered the constitution of a demos, the more democratic the overall arrangement can be. Importantly, such a framework allows us to appreciate when central interventions in subnational authority might and might not be justified. The exercise of central power can occur in both pro-democracy and anti-­democracy ways, as well as in pro-federal and anti-federal ways. And these sets of possibilities are related in important respects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Constitutional Studies
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/ccs.2024.0035
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing Indian federalism

Madhav Khosla
Comparative Constitutional Studies
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Framing Indian federalism

Madhav Khosla
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on a set of historical and contemporary developments in Indian constitutionalism that implicate the question of democracy and the question of federalism. Its goal is to connect the design and application of federal powers with what many regard as an important telos of federalism, namely, the promotion of democracy. Towards this end, it holds up for consideration India’s federal model, which, it is suggested, focuses on the presence of a subnational demos rather than the political identity of subnational units. Such an understanding of federalism de-emphasizes the territorial aspect of federalism and allows federal design to accommodate different kinds of cultural and ethnic realities. This vision proceeds on the premise that the more layered the constitution of a demos, the more democratic the overall arrangement can be. Importantly, such a framework allows us to appreciate when central interventions in subnational authority might and might not be justified. The exercise of central power can occur in both pro-democracy and anti-­democracy ways, as well as in pro-federal and anti-federal ways. And these sets of possibilities are related in important respects.

Comparative Constitutional StudiesVol. 2(2)
Columbia University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.