Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: Combining CNN and LSTM for Enhanced Performance on Facebook Data

This research evaluates the effectiveness of different sentiment analysis techniques, especially the hybrid CNN-LSTM model, on a large dataset of 100,000 Facebook posts and comments. For accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score evaluation, many metrics are in use for comparison with the traditional machine learning models (Naive Bayes, SVM) and other deep learning models such as the standalone CNN and LSTM vis-à-vis the CNN-LSTM model. The CNN-LSTM model showed the highest performances across all metrics: accuracy of 0.91, precision of 0.90, recall of 0.90, and an F1 score of 0.90. Detailed error analysis has shown the problems in sarcasm detection and, to a small extent, the detection of subtly formulated sentiment, while confusion matrix analysis also shows that the neutral class has systematically been mislabeled as positive or negative. These findings point out possible areas one needs to look at for improvements by the inclusion of attention mechanisms. The results of this study emphasize the CNN-LSTM model’s practical applicability to customer feedback analysis, brand monitoring, and market research. Advanced techniques and diverse datasets can be used in further research to improve the robustness of the model and its generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icssas64001.2024.10760800
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: Combining CNN and LSTM for Enhanced Performance on Facebook Data

Rishu, Danish Kundra, Vinay Kukreja
2 citations
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
0.69
article

Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: Combining CNN and LSTM for Enhanced Performance on Facebook Data

Rishu, Danish Kundra, Vinay Kukreja
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research evaluates the effectiveness of different sentiment analysis techniques, especially the hybrid CNN-LSTM model, on a large dataset of 100,000 Facebook posts and comments. For accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score evaluation, many metrics are in use for comparison with the traditional machine learning models (Naive Bayes, SVM) and other deep learning models such as the standalone CNN and LSTM vis-à-vis the CNN-LSTM model. The CNN-LSTM model showed the highest performances across all metrics: accuracy of 0.91, precision of 0.90, recall of 0.90, and an F1 score of 0.90. Detailed error analysis has shown the problems in sarcasm detection and, to a small extent, the detection of subtly formulated sentiment, while confusion matrix analysis also shows that the neutral class has systematically been mislabeled as positive or negative. These findings point out possible areas one needs to look at for improvements by the inclusion of attention mechanisms. The results of this study emphasize the CNN-LSTM model’s practical applicability to customer feedback analysis, brand monitoring, and market research. Advanced techniques and diverse datasets can be used in further research to improve the robustness of the model and its generalizability.

Chitkara University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.