Comparative Evaluation of Random Forest, XGBoost, and SVC Models for Fire Detection

Both natural and man-made ecosystems continue to face a significant fire risk, necessitating effective detection and prevention measures. The early detection of fire can be detected using various ML models. The detection of fire through ML models involves data collection, preparation, model creation, and performance evaluation. Three models were analyzed: Random Forest, XGBoost, and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). The SVC demonstrated an accuracy rate of ${9 5 \%}$, while Random Forest and XGBoost achieved near-perfect accuracy. The results highlight the effectiveness of AI-driven techniques in early fire detection, showing great potential for real-world applications and improved safety protocols through automated insights. Future research will focus on refining these models for large-scale real-world deployment.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icssas64001.2024.10760984
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Random Forest, XGBoost, and SVC Models for Fire Detection

V Asha, M T Vasumathi, Debbrota Paul Chowdhury, Sammangi Vinay et al.
1 citations
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
0.36
article

Comparative Evaluation of Random Forest, XGBoost, and SVC Models for Fire Detection

V Asha, M T Vasumathi, Debbrota Paul Chowdhury, Sammangi Vinay, G Naveen Prakash, G Sai Mouli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Both natural and man-made ecosystems continue to face a significant fire risk, necessitating effective detection and prevention measures. The early detection of fire can be detected using various ML models. The detection of fire through ML models involves data collection, preparation, model creation, and performance evaluation. Three models were analyzed: Random Forest, XGBoost, and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). The SVC demonstrated an accuracy rate of ${9 5 \%}$, while Random Forest and XGBoost achieved near-perfect accuracy. The results highlight the effectiveness of AI-driven techniques in early fire detection, showing great potential for real-world applications and improved safety protocols through automated insights. Future research will focus on refining these models for large-scale real-world deployment.

Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.