Exploring Augmented Reality User Interface Transitions Across Mid-Air, On-Body and Physical Surfaces

Augmented Reality User Interfaces commonly stay floated in midair unless explicitly moved by users. This often results in suboptimal performance due to the absence of haptic feedback and arm fatigue. We explore the transition of AR Interfaces to leverage onbody and physical surfaces, e.g., the arm and desk, in addition to mid-air. We begin with a user study to assess the potential of these surfaces for transitioning virtual UIs. Study results indicate a strong user preference for transitioning interfaces from mid-air to physical surfaces when they are available. We further explore three UI transition mechanisms: manual, semi-automatic, and automatic, each with varying levels of automation and user control. Results from a user study reveal that semi-automatic transition is the most preferred method, as it offers a good balance between automation and user control. We conclude with design guidelines for transitioning AR UIs across mid-air, on-body, and physical surfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar62088.2024.00134
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Augmented Reality User Interface Transitions Across Mid-Air, On-Body and Physical Surfaces

Keiko Katsuragawa, Marium-E Jannat, Khalad Hasan, Prateek Dhaka
4 citations
Augmented Reality Applications
1.00
article

Exploring Augmented Reality User Interface Transitions Across Mid-Air, On-Body and Physical Surfaces

Keiko Katsuragawa, Marium-E Jannat, Khalad Hasan, Prateek Dhaka
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Augmented Reality User Interfaces commonly stay floated in midair unless explicitly moved by users. This often results in suboptimal performance due to the absence of haptic feedback and arm fatigue. We explore the transition of AR Interfaces to leverage onbody and physical surfaces, e.g., the arm and desk, in addition to mid-air. We begin with a user study to assess the potential of these surfaces for transitioning virtual UIs. Study results indicate a strong user preference for transitioning interfaces from mid-air to physical surfaces when they are available. We further explore three UI transition mechanisms: manual, semi-automatic, and automatic, each with varying levels of automation and user control. Results from a user study reveal that semi-automatic transition is the most preferred method, as it offers a good balance between automation and user control. We conclude with design guidelines for transitioning AR UIs across mid-air, on-body, and physical surfaces.

University of British Columbia (CA), Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), University of Waterloo (CA), National Research Council Canada (CA)
Government of Canada, Canada Foundation for Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Augmented Reality Applications
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.