Crossing Rays: Evaluation of Bimanual Mid-air Selection Techniques in an Immersive Environment

Mid-air navigation offers a method of aerial travel that mitigates the constraints associated with continuous navigation. A mid-air selection technique is essential to enable such navigation. In this paper, we consider four variations of intersection-based bimanual midair selection techniques with visual aids and supporting features: Simple-Ray, Simple-Stripe, Precision-Stripe, and Cursor-Sync. We evaluate their performance and user experience compared to an unimanual mid-air selection technique using two tasks that require selecting a mid-air position with or without a reference object. Our findings indicate that the bimanual techniques generally demonstrate faster selection times compared to the unimanual technique. With a supporting feature, the bimanual techniques can provide a more accurate selection than the unimanual technique. Based on our results, we discuss the effect of selection technique’s visual aids and supporting features on performance and user experience for mid-air selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar62088.2024.00047
Primary Topic
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crossing Rays: Evaluation of Bimanual Mid-air Selection Techniques in an Immersive Environment

Dongyun Han, Isaac Cho, Donghoon Kim, Siyeon Bak
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
article

Crossing Rays: Evaluation of Bimanual Mid-air Selection Techniques in an Immersive Environment

Dongyun Han, Isaac Cho, Donghoon Kim, Siyeon Bak
article en

Abstract

Mid-air navigation offers a method of aerial travel that mitigates the constraints associated with continuous navigation. A mid-air selection technique is essential to enable such navigation. In this paper, we consider four variations of intersection-based bimanual midair selection techniques with visual aids and supporting features: Simple-Ray, Simple-Stripe, Precision-Stripe, and Cursor-Sync. We evaluate their performance and user experience compared to an unimanual mid-air selection technique using two tasks that require selecting a mid-air position with or without a reference object. Our findings indicate that the bimanual techniques generally demonstrate faster selection times compared to the unimanual technique. With a supporting feature, the bimanual techniques can provide a more accurate selection than the unimanual technique. Based on our results, we discuss the effect of selection technique’s visual aids and supporting features on performance and user experience for mid-air selection.

Utah State University (US), Hallym University Medical Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crossing Rays: Evaluation of Bimanual Mid-air Selection Techniques in an Immersive Environment — Dongyun Han, Isaac Cho, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS