A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Models for Drowsiness Detection: Evaluating Raw, Processed, and Hybrid Image Datasets with Faster R-CNN

In Mexico, last year, 5.10% of accidents attributed to human factors were related to drowsiness. Consequently, this study investigates the detection of objects to identify visible signs of drowsiness, such as the eyes and mouth, employing a Faster R-CNN model with ResNet50 and FPN. A comparative analysis uses three datasets: raw images, processed images, and a hybrid set comprising both. The results indicate that although the model trained on raw images exhibited the lowest loss and superior performance for certain classes, the model trained on processed images demonstrated the highest efficiency in training time. Meanwhile, the model trained on the hybrid set achieved a balanced performance, integrating the strengths of both preceding models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cce62852.2024.10771046
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Models for Drowsiness Detection: Evaluating Raw, Processed, and Hybrid Image Datasets with Faster R-CNN

Marco Antonio Aceves-Fernández, Jesús Carlos Pedraza‐Ortega, Juan Manuel Ramos-Arreguin, Maria Laura Miranda-Leon
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Models for Drowsiness Detection: Evaluating Raw, Processed, and Hybrid Image Datasets with Faster R-CNN

Marco Antonio Aceves-Fernández, Jesús Carlos Pedraza‐Ortega, Juan Manuel Ramos-Arreguin, Maria Laura Miranda-Leon
article en

Abstract

In Mexico, last year, 5.10% of accidents attributed to human factors were related to drowsiness. Consequently, this study investigates the detection of objects to identify visible signs of drowsiness, such as the eyes and mouth, employing a Faster R-CNN model with ResNet50 and FPN. A comparative analysis uses three datasets: raw images, processed images, and a hybrid set comprising both. The results indicate that although the model trained on raw images exhibited the lowest loss and superior performance for certain classes, the model trained on processed images demonstrated the highest efficiency in training time. Meanwhile, the model trained on the hybrid set achieved a balanced performance, integrating the strengths of both preceding models.

Autonomous University of Queretaro (MX)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.