Process Considerations for Ultraprecise Deposition Printing on Flexible Substrates

In this paper, process considerations for Ultra-Precise Deposition (UPD) printing of fine structures for the heterogeneous integration on flexible substrates are discussed. XTPL recently introduced UPD as an alternative to aerosol jet and ink jet printing technologies. It stands out as a printing technology that can achieve minimum feature sizes and precision on the order of 1 <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mu\mathrm{m}$</tex>. Printability on flexible substrates depends on the surface energy, the topology and the roughness of the substrate. The suitability of UPD for printing conductive traces on flexible substrates is showcased by the fabrication of packaging for chiplets, and printing coplanar waveguides with an air gap of 10 <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mu\mathrm{m}$</tex> on polyimide. A comparison is given between printability on unmetallized polyimide, polyimide with a galvanically grown copper layer and polyimide with a rolled copper layer, as well as the use of planarization layers to mitigate surface roughness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ifetc61155.2024.10771840
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process Considerations for Ultraprecise Deposition Printing on Flexible Substrates

Holger Baur, Norbert Fruehauf, Martin Roemhild, Kai Waldner
1 citations
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
article

Process Considerations for Ultraprecise Deposition Printing on Flexible Substrates

Holger Baur, Norbert Fruehauf, Martin Roemhild, Kai Waldner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, process considerations for Ultra-Precise Deposition (UPD) printing of fine structures for the heterogeneous integration on flexible substrates are discussed. XTPL recently introduced UPD as an alternative to aerosol jet and ink jet printing technologies. It stands out as a printing technology that can achieve minimum feature sizes and precision on the order of 1 <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mu\mathrm{m}$</tex>. Printability on flexible substrates depends on the surface energy, the topology and the roughness of the substrate. The suitability of UPD for printing conductive traces on flexible substrates is showcased by the fabrication of packaging for chiplets, and printing coplanar waveguides with an air gap of 10 <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mu\mathrm{m}$</tex> on polyimide. A comparison is given between printability on unmetallized polyimide, polyimide with a galvanically grown copper layer and polyimide with a rolled copper layer, as well as the use of planarization layers to mitigate surface roughness.

University of Stuttgart (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.