Integrating Multi-Stakeholder Communication into Autonomous Vehicle Trolley Problem

While rare, it is widely accepted that autonomous vehicles (AVs) will find themselves in dilemma scenarios involving vulnerable road users (VRUs). The ethics of these dilemma situations have been debated extensively in the context of trolley problem-like scenarios. What has not been noted is the inherent unfairness implicit in many of these discussions in which VRUs are seen as passive by-standers with no say as to what befalls them. Rather than simply remaining still in a collision scenario, VRUs can (and often do) take action that needs to be accounted for. If we are to increase fairness on public roads, it is important that AVs communicate with VRUs. This paper presents a highly theoretical discussion on the possibility of using communication tools (such as the V2X system) and techniques (derived from the science of human-machine interaction) to elicit positive responses from VRU during inevitable AV collisions. The paper begins with a brief ethical exploration of fairness in the context of current debates surrounding AV collisions. We progress to discuss possible technical solutions to AV-VRU communication, as well as the types of audio, visual, and tactile communication strategies necessary in critical scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wimob61911.2024.10770323
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Multi-Stakeholder Communication into Autonomous Vehicle Trolley Problem

Alexey Vinel, Victoria Laxton, Stephen R. Milford
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Integrating Multi-Stakeholder Communication into Autonomous Vehicle Trolley Problem

Alexey Vinel, Victoria Laxton, Stephen R. Milford
article en

Abstract

While rare, it is widely accepted that autonomous vehicles (AVs) will find themselves in dilemma scenarios involving vulnerable road users (VRUs). The ethics of these dilemma situations have been debated extensively in the context of trolley problem-like scenarios. What has not been noted is the inherent unfairness implicit in many of these discussions in which VRUs are seen as passive by-standers with no say as to what befalls them. Rather than simply remaining still in a collision scenario, VRUs can (and often do) take action that needs to be accounted for. If we are to increase fairness on public roads, it is important that AVs communicate with VRUs. This paper presents a highly theoretical discussion on the possibility of using communication tools (such as the V2X system) and techniques (derived from the science of human-machine interaction) to elicit positive responses from VRU during inevitable AV collisions. The paper begins with a brief ethical exploration of fairness in the context of current debates surrounding AV collisions. We progress to discuss possible technical solutions to AV-VRU communication, as well as the types of audio, visual, and tactile communication strategies necessary in critical scenarios.

Transport Research Laboratory (United Kingdom) (GB), North-West University (ZA), Halmstad University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.