Criminalisation and Control: Mediterranean Maritime Search and Rescue Workers’ Perceptions of Uses of Law

Abstract This article, based on qualitative research of 22 search and rescue (SAR) activists who save migrant lives at sea, examines perceptions of these activists on measures used to criminalise and control them and their organisations. Recognising the law in this area as contested between the impressions of civic society humanitarian activists and state authorities, it analyses how SAR activists perceive how the law is used to disrupt their work. This article examines not only how the law is developed by government, but it will be argued, utilising the theory of critical legal pluralism, that state officials create law in their encounters with SAR activists and their vessels. This article is therefore significant in demonstrating how state officials can create law for nefarious purposes, which has relevance not only to immigration and maritime law, but to other areas of controversial or contested activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Refugee Survey Quarterly
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae026
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Maritime Security and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminalisation and Control: Mediterranean Maritime Search and Rescue Workers’ Perceptions of Uses of Law

Matthew O. Howard, Neil Graffin, Joanne Vincett
3 citations
Refugee Survey Quarterly
Maritime Security and History
6.53
article

Criminalisation and Control: Mediterranean Maritime Search and Rescue Workers’ Perceptions of Uses of Law

Matthew O. Howard, Neil Graffin, Joanne Vincett
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article, based on qualitative research of 22 search and rescue (SAR) activists who save migrant lives at sea, examines perceptions of these activists on measures used to criminalise and control them and their organisations. Recognising the law in this area as contested between the impressions of civic society humanitarian activists and state authorities, it analyses how SAR activists perceive how the law is used to disrupt their work. This article examines not only how the law is developed by government, but it will be argued, utilising the theory of critical legal pluralism, that state officials create law in their encounters with SAR activists and their vessels. This article is therefore significant in demonstrating how state officials can create law for nefarious purposes, which has relevance not only to immigration and maritime law, but to other areas of controversial or contested activity.

Refugee Survey QuarterlyVol. 44(2)
The Open University (GB), University of Kent (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Maritime Security and History
6.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Criminalisation and Control: Mediterranean Maritime Search and Rescue Workers’ Perceptions of Uses of Law — Matthew O. Howard, Neil Graffin, et al. · Refugee Survey Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS