Extending the Q-Score to an Application-Level Quantum Metric Framework

Evaluating the performance of quantum devices is an important step towards scaling quantum devices and eventually using them in practice. The great number of available quantum metrics and the different hardware technologies used to develop quantum computers complicate this evaluation. In addition, different computational paradigms implement quantum operations in different ways. A prominent quantum metric is given by the Q-score metric of Atos. This metric was originally introduced as a standalone way to benchmark devices using the Max-Cut problem. In this work, we show that the Q-score defines a framework of quantum metrics, which allows benchmarking using different problems, user settings and solvers. To showcase the applicability of the framework, we showcase a second Q-score in this framework, called the Q-score Max-Clique. This yields, to our knowledge, the first application-level metric capable of natively comparing three different paradigms of quantum computing. This metric is evaluated on these computational quantum paradigms – quantum annealing, gate-based quantum computing, and photonic quantum computing – and the results are compared to those obtained by classical solvers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/qce60285.2024.00113
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending the Q-Score to an Application-Level Quantum Metric Framework

Niels M. P. Neumann, Frank Phillipson, Ward van der Schoot, Robert Wezeman et al.
3 citations
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
2.34
article

Extending the Q-Score to an Application-Level Quantum Metric Framework

Niels M. P. Neumann, Frank Phillipson, Ward van der Schoot, Robert Wezeman, Rob Kooij
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Evaluating the performance of quantum devices is an important step towards scaling quantum devices and eventually using them in practice. The great number of available quantum metrics and the different hardware technologies used to develop quantum computers complicate this evaluation. In addition, different computational paradigms implement quantum operations in different ways. A prominent quantum metric is given by the Q-score metric of Atos. This metric was originally introduced as a standalone way to benchmark devices using the Max-Cut problem. In this work, we show that the Q-score defines a framework of quantum metrics, which allows benchmarking using different problems, user settings and solvers. To showcase the applicability of the framework, we showcase a second Q-score in this framework, called the Q-score Max-Clique. This yields, to our knowledge, the first application-level metric capable of natively comparing three different paradigms of quantum computing. This metric is evaluated on these computational quantum paradigms – quantum annealing, gate-based quantum computing, and photonic quantum computing – and the results are compared to those obtained by classical solvers.

Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extending the Q-Score to an Application-Level Quantum Metric Framework — Niels M. P. Neumann, Frank Phillipson, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS