Scaling and Assigning Resources on ION Trap QCCD Architectures

Ion trap technologies have earned significant attention as potential candidates for quantum information processing due to their long decoherence times and precise manipulation of individual qubits, distinguishing them from other candidates in the field of quantum technologies. However, scalability remains a challenge, as introducing additional qubits into a trap increases noise and heating effects, consequently decreasing operational fidelity. Trapped-ion Quantum Charge-Coupled Device (QCCD) architectures have addressed this limitation by interconnecting multiple traps and employing ion shuttling mechanisms to transfer ions among traps. This new architectural design requires the development of novel compilation techniques for quantum algorithms, which efficiently allocate and route qubits, and schedule operations. The aim of a compiler is to minimize ion movements and, therefore, reduce the execution time of the circuit to achieve a higher fidelity. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for initial qubit placement, demonstrating enhancements of up to 50% compared to prior methods. Furthermore, we conduct a scalability analysis on two distinct QCCD topologies: a 1D-linear array and a ring structure. Additionally, we evaluate the impact of the excess capacity - i.e. the number of free spaces within a trap - on the algorithm performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/qce60285.2024.00115
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Semiconductor materials and devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaling and Assigning Resources on ION Trap QCCD Architectures

Anabel Ovide, Daniele Cuomo, Carmen G. Almudéver
7 citations
Semiconductor materials and devices
1.46
article

Scaling and Assigning Resources on ION Trap QCCD Architectures

Anabel Ovide, Daniele Cuomo, Carmen G. Almudéver
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Ion trap technologies have earned significant attention as potential candidates for quantum information processing due to their long decoherence times and precise manipulation of individual qubits, distinguishing them from other candidates in the field of quantum technologies. However, scalability remains a challenge, as introducing additional qubits into a trap increases noise and heating effects, consequently decreasing operational fidelity. Trapped-ion Quantum Charge-Coupled Device (QCCD) architectures have addressed this limitation by interconnecting multiple traps and employing ion shuttling mechanisms to transfer ions among traps. This new architectural design requires the development of novel compilation techniques for quantum algorithms, which efficiently allocate and route qubits, and schedule operations. The aim of a compiler is to minimize ion movements and, therefore, reduce the execution time of the circuit to achieve a higher fidelity. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for initial qubit placement, demonstrating enhancements of up to 50% compared to prior methods. Furthermore, we conduct a scalability analysis on two distinct QCCD topologies: a 1D-linear array and a ring structure. Additionally, we evaluate the impact of the excess capacity - i.e. the number of free spaces within a trap - on the algorithm performance.

Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Semiconductor materials and devices
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scaling and Assigning Resources on ION Trap QCCD Architectures — Anabel Ovide, Daniele Cuomo, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS