Radiomics-based classification in imbalanced datasets: complexity or interpretability

Radiomics represents a specialized branch of medical imaging where quantitative features are extracted from images. Performing a classification using radiomics means solving two common problems: the imbalanced setting, and the large number of features that would increase the risk of overfitting. Moreover, since its main application and impact are in clinical field, there is the need of interpretable models for explaining their results. The aim of this study is to compare two modelling approaches: one based on a logistic regression model, known for its simplicity and interpretability, and RUSBoost, an ensemble method designed to handle class imbalance with potentially higher complexity, in order to answer the question whether higher complexity and lower interpretability are justified when dealing with radiomics data. Additionally, due to the large literature suggesting it, we analyze the impact of a feature selection step applied to these two classifiers. Test performances measured across 20 repeated splits on two datasets show how the RUSBoost approach is able to capture more detailed patterns of the data but this is highly dependent on the dataset at hand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10821807
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiomics-based classification in imbalanced datasets: complexity or interpretability

Simone Boesso, Manuela Petti, Lorenzo Farina
1 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
0.35
article

Radiomics-based classification in imbalanced datasets: complexity or interpretability

Simone Boesso, Manuela Petti, Lorenzo Farina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Radiomics represents a specialized branch of medical imaging where quantitative features are extracted from images. Performing a classification using radiomics means solving two common problems: the imbalanced setting, and the large number of features that would increase the risk of overfitting. Moreover, since its main application and impact are in clinical field, there is the need of interpretable models for explaining their results. The aim of this study is to compare two modelling approaches: one based on a logistic regression model, known for its simplicity and interpretability, and RUSBoost, an ensemble method designed to handle class imbalance with potentially higher complexity, in order to answer the question whether higher complexity and lower interpretability are justified when dealing with radiomics data. Additionally, due to the large literature suggesting it, we analyze the impact of a feature selection step applied to these two classifiers. Test performances measured across 20 repeated splits on two datasets show how the RUSBoost approach is able to capture more detailed patterns of the data but this is highly dependent on the dataset at hand.

Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Radiomics-based classification in imbalanced datasets: complexity or interpretability — Simone Boesso, Manuela Petti, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS