Comparative Analysis of Lung Cancer Detection Using CNN, KNN, and SVM Algorithms: Evaluating Accuracy and Performance

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of mortality, emphasizing the crucial need for early detection to improve survival rates. Computed tomography (CT) imaging stands out as a pivotal strategy in this endeavor. However, the escalating volume of CT images necessitates efficient and accurate automated detection methods to mitigate manual labeling efforts and ensure consistent results. This research paper employs a comprehensive strategy, merging traditional machine learning models (including KNN and SVM) with state-of-the-art feature extraction methods such as PCA, HOG, and VGG16 transfer learning, as well as utilizing a dedicated Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for classification. By amalgamating these methodologies, the study seeks to comprehensively evaluate their efficacy in accurately diagnosing lung cancer. The anticipated outcomes aim to contribute novel insights to medical image analysis, particularly in advancing early cancer detection. Through this research, valuable contributions are expected to be made towards the enhancement of medical image analysis techniques, thereby pushing the boundaries of early cancer detection and ultimately improving patient outcomes. The best result of the proposed model shows the accuracy percentage of the SVM classifier varies from ${9 0 \%}$ to ${9 6 \%}$, the accuracy of the KNN classifier varies from 95% to 100%, and the accuracy of the CNN classifier varies from ${9 6 \%}$ to ${9 9 \%}$.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sparc61891.2024.10829204
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Lung Cancer Detection Using CNN, KNN, and SVM Algorithms: Evaluating Accuracy and Performance

S Jalaja, H G Prerita
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Comparative Analysis of Lung Cancer Detection Using CNN, KNN, and SVM Algorithms: Evaluating Accuracy and Performance

S Jalaja, H G Prerita
article en

Abstract

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of mortality, emphasizing the crucial need for early detection to improve survival rates. Computed tomography (CT) imaging stands out as a pivotal strategy in this endeavor. However, the escalating volume of CT images necessitates efficient and accurate automated detection methods to mitigate manual labeling efforts and ensure consistent results. This research paper employs a comprehensive strategy, merging traditional machine learning models (including KNN and SVM) with state-of-the-art feature extraction methods such as PCA, HOG, and VGG16 transfer learning, as well as utilizing a dedicated Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for classification. By amalgamating these methodologies, the study seeks to comprehensively evaluate their efficacy in accurately diagnosing lung cancer. The anticipated outcomes aim to contribute novel insights to medical image analysis, particularly in advancing early cancer detection. Through this research, valuable contributions are expected to be made towards the enhancement of medical image analysis techniques, thereby pushing the boundaries of early cancer detection and ultimately improving patient outcomes. The best result of the proposed model shows the accuracy percentage of the SVM classifier varies from ${9 0 \%}$ to ${9 6 \%}$, the accuracy of the KNN classifier varies from 95% to 100%, and the accuracy of the CNN classifier varies from ${9 6 \%}$ to ${9 9 \%}$.

Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital (IN), International Institute of Information Technology Bangalore (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.