Reporting Lines of Inquiry: Documenting Evaluations and Making Values Explicit

The Program Evaluation Standards call for “rigorous documentation of evaluations” and emphasize evaluators’ responsibility to make explicit the key values that shape evaluations. Clear, complete, values-attentive evaluation reporting is necessary so constituents can understand, learn from, critique, improve, and take action based on evaluations. Yet, scholars have documented gaps in reporting that can limit understanding of evaluations. In this practice note, we provide guidance for reporting a central, value-laden component of evaluations: lines of inquiry. An evaluative line of inquiry is a linked set of an evaluation question, associated criteria or constructs/variables, data collection or analysis method(s), findings, and evaluative conclusion(s) that addresses a specific dimension of quality. We draw on a recent empirical analysis to outline the elements evaluators should include when reporting lines of inquiry and share exemplars that illustrate ways to communicate the links among these elements. We offer this guidance to assist evaluators in documenting their evaluations and making key values explicit to ensure meaningful understanding of evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting Lines of Inquiry: Documenting Evaluations and Making Values Explicit

Mikayla Strasser, Rebecca M. Teasdale, Ceily L. Moore
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
0.49
article

Reporting Lines of Inquiry: Documenting Evaluations and Making Values Explicit

Mikayla Strasser, Rebecca M. Teasdale, Ceily L. Moore
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Program Evaluation Standards call for “rigorous documentation of evaluations” and emphasize evaluators’ responsibility to make explicit the key values that shape evaluations. Clear, complete, values-attentive evaluation reporting is necessary so constituents can understand, learn from, critique, improve, and take action based on evaluations. Yet, scholars have documented gaps in reporting that can limit understanding of evaluations. In this practice note, we provide guidance for reporting a central, value-laden component of evaluations: lines of inquiry. An evaluative line of inquiry is a linked set of an evaluation question, associated criteria or constructs/variables, data collection or analysis method(s), findings, and evaluative conclusion(s) that addresses a specific dimension of quality. We draw on a recent empirical analysis to outline the elements evaluators should include when reporting lines of inquiry and share exemplars that illustrate ways to communicate the links among these elements. We offer this guidance to assist evaluators in documenting their evaluations and making key values explicit to ensure meaningful understanding of evaluations.

Canadian Journal of Program EvaluationVol. 39(2)
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reporting Lines of Inquiry: Documenting Evaluations and Making Values Explicit — Mikayla Strasser, Rebecca M. Teasdale, et al. · Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS