Evaluation of Dermal Irritation with the Dextroamphetamine Transdermal System (d-ATS) in Healthy Adults and Patients with ADHD

Background The d-ATS patch was developed as an alternative to oral amphetamine formulations for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) recommends evaluating irritation of transdermal patches under intended (rotating application sites) and exaggerated use (repeated application to one site). These studies assessed irritation after d-ATS application. Methods Intended Use: In Study 1 , adults with ADHD, d-ATS was applied daily (9-hour application) for 4 weeks rotated between 5 sites (left/right: hip, flank, chest, upper arm, upper back), with irritation assessed on Days 1, 7, 14, 27, and 28. In Study 2 , children and adolescents with ADHD, d-ATS was applied daily (9 hours) for 5 weeks to the hip (left or right), with irritation assessed daily. Exaggerated Use: In Study 3 , adults with ADHD, d-ATS was applied daily (9 hours) to the hip (repeated application to one site) for 4 weeks, with irritation assessed daily. In Study 4 , healthy adults, 1 d-ATS and 1 placebo patch were applied daily (24 hours) for 21 days to the back (repeated application to 1 site), with irritation assessed daily. Irritation was assessed by a trained evaluator 30-60 min after patch removal using Berger and Bowman Dermal Response (0-7, with 7 being the worst reaction) and Other Effects (0-3, with 3 being the worst reaction) scores. Dermal Response and Other Effects scores were added together for the combined score. A combined score of ≥3 was considered clinically meaningful irritation. Results Intended Use: In Study 1 (N=15), meaningful irritation after patch removal was reported in 9/15 subjects (60%). The mean (SD) combined score was 1.05 (0.21), with no treatment-emergent adverse events at the application site. In Study 2 (N=110), all combined irritation scores were ≤3 for d-ATS, with a combined score of 3 reported by 2% of patients. There were no discontinuations due to dermal reactions in either study. Exaggerated Use: In Study 3 (N=20), meaningful irritation was reported in 19/20 subjects (95%). The mean (SD) combined score was 1.63 (0.78). In Study 4, mean (SD) combined scores were 2.1 (0.73) for d-ATS and 1.3 (0.69) for placebo (N=206 for both), with no discontinuations due to dermal reactions. Conclusions These results support previous findings that d-ATS is safe and well tolerated for ADHD. After intended use, irritation was minimal and did not cause study discontinuations. Funding Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CNS Spectrums
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852924001573
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Dermal Irritation with the Dextroamphetamine Transdermal System (d-ATS) in Healthy Adults and Patients with ADHD

Marina Komaroff, Suzanne Meeves, Mariacristina Castelli, Kanan Balakrishnan et al.
CNS Spectrums
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Evaluation of Dermal Irritation with the Dextroamphetamine Transdermal System (d-ATS) in Healthy Adults and Patients with ADHD

Marina Komaroff, Suzanne Meeves, Mariacristina Castelli, Kanan Balakrishnan, Houda Haj-Ibrahim, Mahwish Khan
article en

Abstract

Background The d-ATS patch was developed as an alternative to oral amphetamine formulations for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) recommends evaluating irritation of transdermal patches under intended (rotating application sites) and exaggerated use (repeated application to one site). These studies assessed irritation after d-ATS application. Methods Intended Use: In Study 1 , adults with ADHD, d-ATS was applied daily (9-hour application) for 4 weeks rotated between 5 sites (left/right: hip, flank, chest, upper arm, upper back), with irritation assessed on Days 1, 7, 14, 27, and 28. In Study 2 , children and adolescents with ADHD, d-ATS was applied daily (9 hours) for 5 weeks to the hip (left or right), with irritation assessed daily. Exaggerated Use: In Study 3 , adults with ADHD, d-ATS was applied daily (9 hours) to the hip (repeated application to one site) for 4 weeks, with irritation assessed daily. In Study 4 , healthy adults, 1 d-ATS and 1 placebo patch were applied daily (24 hours) for 21 days to the back (repeated application to 1 site), with irritation assessed daily. Irritation was assessed by a trained evaluator 30-60 min after patch removal using Berger and Bowman Dermal Response (0-7, with 7 being the worst reaction) and Other Effects (0-3, with 3 being the worst reaction) scores. Dermal Response and Other Effects scores were added together for the combined score. A combined score of ≥3 was considered clinically meaningful irritation. Results Intended Use: In Study 1 (N=15), meaningful irritation after patch removal was reported in 9/15 subjects (60%). The mean (SD) combined score was 1.05 (0.21), with no treatment-emergent adverse events at the application site. In Study 2 (N=110), all combined irritation scores were ≤3 for d-ATS, with a combined score of 3 reported by 2% of patients. There were no discontinuations due to dermal reactions in either study. Exaggerated Use: In Study 3 (N=20), meaningful irritation was reported in 19/20 subjects (95%). The mean (SD) combined score was 1.63 (0.78). In Study 4, mean (SD) combined scores were 2.1 (0.73) for d-ATS and 1.3 (0.69) for placebo (N=206 for both), with no discontinuations due to dermal reactions. Conclusions These results support previous findings that d-ATS is safe and well tolerated for ADHD. After intended use, irritation was minimal and did not cause study discontinuations. Funding Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

CNS SpectrumsVol. 29(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.