Impact of Cariprazine on Anhedonia Symptoms in Patients with Bipolar I Depression: Pooled Analysis of 3 Pivotal Clinical Trials

Purpose Anhedonia characterizes major depressive episodes in bipolar depression and is associated with more severe illness/poor prognosis. These post hoc analyses assess effect of cariprazine 1.5 and 3 mg/d on anhedonia symptoms in patients with bipolar I depression. Methods Data were pooled from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled bipolar I depression trials in cariprazine. Cariprazine 1.5 and 3 mg/d versus placebo were evaluated in patient subgroups stratified by median baseline MADRS anhedonia score (higher anhedonia=score ≥19; lower anhedonia=score <19). Outcomes included mean change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total and anhedonia factor score (sum of apparent sadness, reported sadness, concentration, lassitude, and inability to feel items). The proportion of patients with week 6 anhedonia factor response (≥50% improvement from baseline) was also determined. Changes from baseline were analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Results There were 760 patients in the higher anhedonia subgroup (placebo=249, cariprazine: 1.5 mg/d=261; 3 mg/d=250) and 623 patients in the lower anhedonia subgroup (placebo=211, cariprazine: 1.5 mg/d=200; 3 mg/d=212). Mean baseline MADRS total score was higher in the higher anhedonia subgroup (total=33.6) than in the lower anhedonia subgroup (total=27.6). Change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total score was greater for both cariprazine doses versus placebo in the higher anhedonia subgroup (least squares mean difference [LSMD] and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 mg/d=-3.01 [-4.84, -1.19], P =.0012; 3 mg/d: -3.26 [-5.12, -1.40], P =.0006); in the lower anhedonia subgroup, cariprazine 1.5 mg/d was statistically significant versus placebo (-2.61 [-4.28, -0.93], P =.0024). In the higher anhedonia subgroup at week 6, change from baseline in anhedonia factor score was significant versus placebo for both cariprazine doses (1.5 mg/d=-1.97 [-3.13, -0.81], P =.0009; 3 mg/d=-2.07 [-3.26, -0.89], P =.0006); in the lower subgroup, the difference was significant versus placebo for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (-1.70 [-2.77, -0.62], P =.0021). After adjusting for changes in other depressive symptoms, LSMDs versus placebo in the anhedonia factor score remained significant for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (-1.21 [-2.05, -0.36], P =.0052) and 3 mg/d (-1.00 [-1.86, -0.14], P =.0233) in the higher anhedonia subgroup, and for 1.5 mg/d (-1.06 [-1.92, -0.19], P =.0164) in the lower subgroup. In the higher anhedonia subgroup, rates of anhedonia factor response were greater versus placebo (31.7%) for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (44.8%, P =.0028) and 3 mg/d (45.6%, P =.0019); in the lower subgroup, response rates were 39.3% for placebo, 48.0% for 1.5 mg/d, and 46.7% for 3 mg/d. Adverse events in ≥5% cariprazine and twice placebo were nausea, akathisia, restlessness, and EPS. Importance Those with bipolar depression and anhedonia cariprazine demonstrated a potent antidepressant and antianhedonic effect in higher/lower anhedonia subgroups. Funding AbbVie This data was previously presented at the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) Congress; Barcelona, Spain; October 7 – 10, 2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CNS Spectrums
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852924001421
Primary Topic
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Cariprazine on Anhedonia Symptoms in Patients with Bipolar I Depression: Pooled Analysis of 3 Pivotal Clinical Trials

Huy‐Binh Nguyen, Ken Kramer, Pierre‐Michel Llorca, Lauren C. Aronin et al.
CNS Spectrums
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
article

Impact of Cariprazine on Anhedonia Symptoms in Patients with Bipolar I Depression: Pooled Analysis of 3 Pivotal Clinical Trials

Huy‐Binh Nguyen, Ken Kramer, Pierre‐Michel Llorca, Lauren C. Aronin, Jun Yu, Roger S McIntyre
article en

Abstract

Purpose Anhedonia characterizes major depressive episodes in bipolar depression and is associated with more severe illness/poor prognosis. These post hoc analyses assess effect of cariprazine 1.5 and 3 mg/d on anhedonia symptoms in patients with bipolar I depression. Methods Data were pooled from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled bipolar I depression trials in cariprazine. Cariprazine 1.5 and 3 mg/d versus placebo were evaluated in patient subgroups stratified by median baseline MADRS anhedonia score (higher anhedonia=score ≥19; lower anhedonia=score <19). Outcomes included mean change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total and anhedonia factor score (sum of apparent sadness, reported sadness, concentration, lassitude, and inability to feel items). The proportion of patients with week 6 anhedonia factor response (≥50% improvement from baseline) was also determined. Changes from baseline were analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Results There were 760 patients in the higher anhedonia subgroup (placebo=249, cariprazine: 1.5 mg/d=261; 3 mg/d=250) and 623 patients in the lower anhedonia subgroup (placebo=211, cariprazine: 1.5 mg/d=200; 3 mg/d=212). Mean baseline MADRS total score was higher in the higher anhedonia subgroup (total=33.6) than in the lower anhedonia subgroup (total=27.6). Change from baseline to week 6 in MADRS total score was greater for both cariprazine doses versus placebo in the higher anhedonia subgroup (least squares mean difference [LSMD] and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 mg/d=-3.01 [-4.84, -1.19], P =.0012; 3 mg/d: -3.26 [-5.12, -1.40], P =.0006); in the lower anhedonia subgroup, cariprazine 1.5 mg/d was statistically significant versus placebo (-2.61 [-4.28, -0.93], P =.0024). In the higher anhedonia subgroup at week 6, change from baseline in anhedonia factor score was significant versus placebo for both cariprazine doses (1.5 mg/d=-1.97 [-3.13, -0.81], P =.0009; 3 mg/d=-2.07 [-3.26, -0.89], P =.0006); in the lower subgroup, the difference was significant versus placebo for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (-1.70 [-2.77, -0.62], P =.0021). After adjusting for changes in other depressive symptoms, LSMDs versus placebo in the anhedonia factor score remained significant for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (-1.21 [-2.05, -0.36], P =.0052) and 3 mg/d (-1.00 [-1.86, -0.14], P =.0233) in the higher anhedonia subgroup, and for 1.5 mg/d (-1.06 [-1.92, -0.19], P =.0164) in the lower subgroup. In the higher anhedonia subgroup, rates of anhedonia factor response were greater versus placebo (31.7%) for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (44.8%, P =.0028) and 3 mg/d (45.6%, P =.0019); in the lower subgroup, response rates were 39.3% for placebo, 48.0% for 1.5 mg/d, and 46.7% for 3 mg/d. Adverse events in ≥5% cariprazine and twice placebo were nausea, akathisia, restlessness, and EPS. Importance Those with bipolar depression and anhedonia cariprazine demonstrated a potent antidepressant and antianhedonic effect in higher/lower anhedonia subgroups. Funding AbbVie This data was previously presented at the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) Congress; Barcelona, Spain; October 7 – 10, 2023.

CNS SpectrumsVol. 29(5)
University of Toronto (CA), Madison Group (United States) (US), University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), Sigma Clermont (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.