Examining Influences on Beliefs About Psychology as a Science

This study explored how certain factors can influence people's beliefs in psychological myths and their views of psychology as a science. We assessed conservatism, religiosity, critical thinking, need for cognition, number of psychology courses taken, college credits earned, belief in psychology as a science, and endorsement of psychological myths. We hypothesized that conservatism and religiosity would correlate positively with myth endorsement and negatively with seeing psychology as a science, while critical thinking, need for cognition, psychology courses taken, and total credits would show negative correlations. Results revealed conservatism positively influenced myth endorsement and negatively influenced seeing psychology as a science, supporting the hypothesis. However, religiosity did not significantly correlate with either outcome, failing to support previous research and our hypothesis. As expected, critical thinking, need for cognition, psychology courses, and total credits were positively correlated to seeing psychology as a science and negatively related to myth endorsement. These findings highlight the role of conservative ideology, critical thinking, and educational attainment in shaping beliefs about psychological science and misconceptions. The discovery that religiosity did not impact these beliefs counters assumptions about the incompatibility between religion and science. Limitations like the homogenous sample and political scale must be addressed. Overall, this research bridges how people come to accept psychological misinformation with implications for public comprehension of mental health issues. We discuss how disseminating accurate psychological knowledge dismantles myths and how conservative distrust of science could negatively impact society if people become less likely to view psychology as legitimate or seek psychological help.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psi Beta Research Journal - Brief Reports
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54581/kbns7441
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Influences on Beliefs About Psychology as a Science

Michelle Singer Foust, J. Joel Moss, James L. Jordan, Michael Schäffer et al.
Psi Beta Research Journal - Brief Reports
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Examining Influences on Beliefs About Psychology as a Science

Michelle Singer Foust, J. Joel Moss, James L. Jordan, Michael Schäffer, Raina Darr
article en

Abstract

This study explored how certain factors can influence people's beliefs in psychological myths and their views of psychology as a science. We assessed conservatism, religiosity, critical thinking, need for cognition, number of psychology courses taken, college credits earned, belief in psychology as a science, and endorsement of psychological myths. We hypothesized that conservatism and religiosity would correlate positively with myth endorsement and negatively with seeing psychology as a science, while critical thinking, need for cognition, psychology courses taken, and total credits would show negative correlations. Results revealed conservatism positively influenced myth endorsement and negatively influenced seeing psychology as a science, supporting the hypothesis. However, religiosity did not significantly correlate with either outcome, failing to support previous research and our hypothesis. As expected, critical thinking, need for cognition, psychology courses, and total credits were positively correlated to seeing psychology as a science and negatively related to myth endorsement. These findings highlight the role of conservative ideology, critical thinking, and educational attainment in shaping beliefs about psychological science and misconceptions. The discovery that religiosity did not impact these beliefs counters assumptions about the incompatibility between religion and science. Limitations like the homogenous sample and political scale must be addressed. Overall, this research bridges how people come to accept psychological misinformation with implications for public comprehension of mental health issues. We discuss how disseminating accurate psychological knowledge dismantles myths and how conservative distrust of science could negatively impact society if people become less likely to view psychology as legitimate or seek psychological help.

Psi Beta Research Journal - Brief Reports
Lorain County Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.