Assessing the impacts of stakeholder involvement in long‐term agricultural experiments via a case study in the upper US Midwest

Agricultural researchers are increasingly encouraged to engage with stakeholders to improve the usefulness of their projects, but iterative research on the design and assessment of stakeholder engagement is scarce. The USDA Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network recognizes the importance of effective engagement in increasing the utility of information and technologies for future agriculture. Diverse stakeholders and researchers at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) LTAR site co-designed the KBS LTAR Aspirational Cropping System Experiment, a process that provides a testing ground and interdisciplinary collaborations to develop theory-driven assessment protocols for continuous stakeholder engagement. Informed by prior work, we designed an assessment protocol that aims to measure participant preferences, experiences, and perceived benefits at various stages of this long-term project. Two online surveys were conducted in 2021 and 2022 among participants of LTAR engagement events at KBS, using a pre-post design, resulting in 125 total responses. Survey respondents had positive perceptions of the collaboratively designed research experiment. They had a strong expectation that the research would generate conservation and environmental advances while also informing policy and programs. Respondents also indicated a desire to network with other stakeholders. The research team noted the significant role of a long-term stakeholder engagement specialist in inviting participants from diverse backgrounds and creating an open and engaging experience. Overall, results highlight an interdisciplinary path of intentional and iterative engagement and evaluation to build a program that is adaptive and responsive to stakeholder needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Quality
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20676
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impacts of stakeholder involvement in long‐term agricultural experiments via a case study in the upper US Midwest

Sandra T. Marquart‐Pyatt, G. Philip Robertson, Tian Guo, Tayler C. Ulbrich et al.
2 citations
Journal of Environmental Quality
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
8.34
article

Assessing the impacts of stakeholder involvement in long‐term agricultural experiments via a case study in the upper US Midwest

Sandra T. Marquart‐Pyatt, G. Philip Robertson, Tian Guo, Tayler C. Ulbrich, Brook Wilke, Julie E. Doll
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Agricultural researchers are increasingly encouraged to engage with stakeholders to improve the usefulness of their projects, but iterative research on the design and assessment of stakeholder engagement is scarce. The USDA Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network recognizes the importance of effective engagement in increasing the utility of information and technologies for future agriculture. Diverse stakeholders and researchers at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) LTAR site co-designed the KBS LTAR Aspirational Cropping System Experiment, a process that provides a testing ground and interdisciplinary collaborations to develop theory-driven assessment protocols for continuous stakeholder engagement. Informed by prior work, we designed an assessment protocol that aims to measure participant preferences, experiences, and perceived benefits at various stages of this long-term project. Two online surveys were conducted in 2021 and 2022 among participants of LTAR engagement events at KBS, using a pre-post design, resulting in 125 total responses. Survey respondents had positive perceptions of the collaboratively designed research experiment. They had a strong expectation that the research would generate conservation and environmental advances while also informing policy and programs. Respondents also indicated a desire to network with other stakeholders. The research team noted the significant role of a long-term stakeholder engagement specialist in inviting participants from diverse backgrounds and creating an open and engaging experience. Overall, results highlight an interdisciplinary path of intentional and iterative engagement and evaluation to build a program that is adaptive and responsive to stakeholder needs.

Journal of Environmental QualityVol. 54(5)
Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (US), Michigan State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Michigan State University, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.