On bad intentions and harmful consequences: understanding public perceptions of environmental crime seriousness

Abstract The public has grown increasingly concerned about environmental issues. However, few studies examine the perceived seriousness of environmental crimes. Those that do tend to focus on US citizens and compare crime seriousness ratings among different types of crimes, rather than examining the factors that shape perceptions of environmental crime seriousness. By employing a vignette survey among Dutch citizens ( N = 261), the current paper seeks to address this knowledge gap. It focuses on two such factors: (1) whether or not the environmental crime is committed intentionally, and (2) whether or not the environmental crime causes considerable harm. The results show that environmental crimes were perceived as more serious when committed intentionally and when they caused considerable harm. Furthermore, intentions affected perceived seriousness less in case of harm and harm affected perceived seriousness less in case the crime was committed intentionally. Together, these findings enhance our understanding of the factors that shape the perceived seriousness of environmental crimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime Law and Social Change
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10188-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On bad intentions and harmful consequences: understanding public perceptions of environmental crime seriousness

Lisa F. M. Ansems, Jelle Brands, Marieke Kluin
1 citations
Crime Law and Social Change
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
2.31
article

On bad intentions and harmful consequences: understanding public perceptions of environmental crime seriousness

Lisa F. M. Ansems, Jelle Brands, Marieke Kluin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The public has grown increasingly concerned about environmental issues. However, few studies examine the perceived seriousness of environmental crimes. Those that do tend to focus on US citizens and compare crime seriousness ratings among different types of crimes, rather than examining the factors that shape perceptions of environmental crime seriousness. By employing a vignette survey among Dutch citizens ( N = 261), the current paper seeks to address this knowledge gap. It focuses on two such factors: (1) whether or not the environmental crime is committed intentionally, and (2) whether or not the environmental crime causes considerable harm. The results show that environmental crimes were perceived as more serious when committed intentionally and when they caused considerable harm. Furthermore, intentions affected perceived seriousness less in case of harm and harm affected perceived seriousness less in case the crime was committed intentionally. Together, these findings enhance our understanding of the factors that shape the perceived seriousness of environmental crimes.

Crime Law and Social ChangeVol. 83(1)
Leiden University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On bad intentions and harmful consequences: understanding public perceptions of environmental crime seriousness — Lisa F. M. Ansems, Jelle Brands, et al. · Crime Law and Social Change (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS