Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of fluticasone nasal spray in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-formulation, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted under fasting conditions. A total of 120 healthy male and female subjects were enrolled, of which 119 subjects completed the entire study. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent drug, fluticasone propionate (FP), in plasma were as follows: For the test formulation, maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) was 10.3 pg/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) was 65.6 pg•h/mL, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) was 86.4 pg•h/mL. For the reference formulation: C<sub>max</sub> was 8.80 pg/mL, AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 58.2 pg•h/mL, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> was 75.2 pg•h/mL. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric means for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>, and C<sub>max</sub> between the 2 formulations were 105%-120%, 103%-120%, and 112%-124%, respectively. The results show that the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the FP nasal spray (test formulation) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1505
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Zejuan Wang, Cong Wei, Xueyan Li, Gang Chen et al.
1 links
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Zejuan Wang, Cong Wei, Xueyan Li, Gang Chen, Xiaolin L. Wang, Min Li, Yanan Zhang, Xiaona Liu, Jin Wang, Dan Zhang, Aihua Du
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of fluticasone nasal spray in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-formulation, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted under fasting conditions. A total of 120 healthy male and female subjects were enrolled, of which 119 subjects completed the entire study. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent drug, fluticasone propionate (FP), in plasma were as follows: For the test formulation, maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) was 10.3 pg/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) was 65.6 pg•h/mL, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) was 86.4 pg•h/mL. For the reference formulation: C<sub>max</sub> was 8.80 pg/mL, AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 58.2 pg•h/mL, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> was 75.2 pg•h/mL. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric means for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>, and C<sub>max</sub> between the 2 formulations were 105%-120%, 103%-120%, and 112%-124%, respectively. The results show that the test and reference formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the FP nasal spray (test formulation) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.

Clinical Pharmacology in Drug DevelopmentVol. 14(3)
Aerospace Center Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.