Choosing the right crowdsourcing strategy: Implications for governments' crowdsourcing initiatives

Abstract Building on recent advances in crowdsourcing research, we argue that, when using crowdsourcing, governments should accurately select the crowd they wish to engage with, depending on the problem to be solved. While targeting a large crowd may be common, it is not always the most appropriate: it can waste significant resources without necessarily producing satisfactory results. We contend that the nature of the problem should determine the crowdsourcing strategy. We propose a typology of problems based on their scope and technicity: specific nontechnical, specific technical, broad nontechnical, and broad technical. We introduce the main crowdsourcing strategies—fishing, hunting, and collective production—explain the rationale for each, and offer a practitioner's perspective on their costs and benefits. We then discuss how each strategy is suited for solving diverse problems and propose guidelines for governments on using crowdsourcing more effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13917
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choosing the right crowdsourcing strategy: Implications for governments' crowdsourcing initiatives

Ana Colovic, Mehdi Bagherzadeh, Jean‐Louis Liévin
4 citations
Public Administration Review
Open Source Software Innovations
6.77
article

Choosing the right crowdsourcing strategy: Implications for governments' crowdsourcing initiatives

Ana Colovic, Mehdi Bagherzadeh, Jean‐Louis Liévin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Building on recent advances in crowdsourcing research, we argue that, when using crowdsourcing, governments should accurately select the crowd they wish to engage with, depending on the problem to be solved. While targeting a large crowd may be common, it is not always the most appropriate: it can waste significant resources without necessarily producing satisfactory results. We contend that the nature of the problem should determine the crowdsourcing strategy. We propose a typology of problems based on their scope and technicity: specific nontechnical, specific technical, broad nontechnical, and broad technical. We introduce the main crowdsourcing strategies—fishing, hunting, and collective production—explain the rationale for each, and offer a practitioner's perspective on their costs and benefits. We then discuss how each strategy is suited for solving diverse problems and propose guidelines for governments on using crowdsourcing more effectively.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(5)
NEOMA Business School (FR), Issy Media (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Open Source Software Innovations
6.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.