Comparison of good review practices of seven countries participating in the ECOWAS medicines regulatory harmonisation initiative: identifying opportunities for improvement
The study compared the organisation, GRevPs and quality decision-making processes of the NMRAs that actively participate in the ECOWAS-MRH initiative. Though some differences were identified with regard to organisation, a significant number of good review practice initiatives and quality decision-making practices were identified yet to be implemented to promote continuous improvement in the regulatory processes of the NMRAs.
Authors
- Seth Kwaku Seaneke
- Mercy Owusu-Asante
- D. Lamboni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4249-529X)
- Sheku Mansaray
- Sam Salek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4612-5699)
- Christianah Mojisola Adeyeye
- Stuart Walker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-5306)
- James P. Komeh
- Delese Mimi Darko
- Oumy Kalsoum Ndao
- Rokhaya Ndiaye Kande
- Maheza Agba
- Aminata Nacoulma
- Oula Ibrahim Olivier Traore
- Abayomi Akinyemi
- Coulibaly Assane
- Clarisse Épse Kaul Meledje Clamoungou
Institutions
- University of Hertfordshire (GB)
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (GB)
- National Agency for the Control of AIDS (NG)
- Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SL)
- University of Lomé (TG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Medicine
- Published
- 2025-01-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1520892
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.26
Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation