The NANOGrav 15 Yr Data Set: Removing Pulsars One by One from the Pulsar Timing Array

Abstract Evidence has emerged for a stochastic signal correlated among 67 pulsars within the 15 yr pulsar-timing data set compiled by the NANOGrav collaboration. Similar signals have been found in data from the European, Indian, Parkes, and Chinese pulsar timing arrays. This signal has been interpreted as indicative of the presence of a nanohertz stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB). To explore the internal consistency of this result, we investigate how the recovered signal strength changes as we remove the pulsars one by one from the data set. We calculate the signal strength using the (noise-marginalized) optimal statistic, a frequentist metric designed to measure the correlated excess power in the residuals of the arrival times of the radio pulses. We identify several features emerging from this analysis that were initially unexpected. The significance of these features, however, can only be assessed by comparing the real data to synthetic data sets. After conducting identical analyses on simulated data sets, we do not find anything inconsistent with the presence of a stochastic GWB in the NANOGrav 15 yr data. The methodologies developed here can offer additional tools for application to future, more sensitive data sets. While this analysis provides an internal consistency check of the NANOGrav results, it does not eliminate the necessity for additional investigations that could identify potential systematics or uncover unmodeled physical phenomena in the data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad93aa
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The NANOGrav 15 Yr Data Set: Removing Pulsars One by One from the Pulsar Timing Array

Aaron D. Johnson, Dustin R. Madison, Bjorn Larsen, Sarah J. Vigeland et al.
1 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
article

The NANOGrav 15 Yr Data Set: Removing Pulsars One by One from the Pulsar Timing Array

Aaron D. Johnson, Dustin R. Madison, Bjorn Larsen, Sarah J. Vigeland, Caner Ünal, J. M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, H. Thankful Cromartie, Natasha McMann, Laura Blecha, J. S. Key, Ken D. Olum, Bradley W. Meyers, Alexander McEwen, James W. McKee, M. A. McLaughlin, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, Carl Schmiedekamp, B. Bécsy, Nihan S. Pol, N. Garver-Daniels, Timothy Dolch, Nima Laal, E. C. Ferrara, S. M. Ransom, Akash Anumarlapudi, Luke Zoltan Kelley, J. G. Baier, Emiko C. Gardiner, David J. Nice, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, David L. Kaplan, Anne M. Archibald, William Fiore, Caitlin A. Witt, Tyler Cohen, Gabriel E. Freedman, Michael T. Lam, Deborah C. Good, Olivia Young, Michele Vallisneri, Haley M. Wahl, Kayhan Gültekin, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph Glaser, Lankeswar Dey, Peter A. Gentile, Ryan S. Lynch, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ingrid H. Stairs, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Kathryn Crowter, Timothy T. Pennucci, Duncan R. Lorimer, P. T. Baker, Paul R. Brook, Ross J. Jennings, Kai Schmitz, Maria Charisi, Alexander Saffer, Shami Chatterjee, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Adam Brazier, Andrea Mitridate, Xavier Siemens, Ann Schmiedekamp, Paul B. Demorest, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Heling Deng, Kevin Stovall, Matthew T. Kerr, Jessie C. Runnoe, F. Crawford, Daniel R. Stinebring, Paul S. Ray, Magdalena S. Siwek, L. Guertin, Benetge B. P. Perera, David Wright, Megan L. Jones, N. Lewandowska, Joseph Simon, William G. Lamb, Zaven Arzoumanian, Andrew R. Kaiser, Jing Luo, P. M. Meyers, Jacob E. Turner, Stella Koch Ocker, Cherry Ng, Chung‐Pei Ma, Gabriella Agazie, Megan E. DeCesar, Joseph K. Swiggum, Tingting Liu, H. Middleton, Emmanuel Fonseca, C. J. Moore, Kyle A. Gersbach, H. A. Radovan, Sophia V. Sosa Fiscella, Stephen R. Taylor, T. Joseph W. Lazio, Joseph D. Romano, A. Vecchio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Evidence has emerged for a stochastic signal correlated among 67 pulsars within the 15 yr pulsar-timing data set compiled by the NANOGrav collaboration. Similar signals have been found in data from the European, Indian, Parkes, and Chinese pulsar timing arrays. This signal has been interpreted as indicative of the presence of a nanohertz stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB). To explore the internal consistency of this result, we investigate how the recovered signal strength changes as we remove the pulsars one by one from the data set. We calculate the signal strength using the (noise-marginalized) optimal statistic, a frequentist metric designed to measure the correlated excess power in the residuals of the arrival times of the radio pulses. We identify several features emerging from this analysis that were initially unexpected. The significance of these features, however, can only be assessed by comparing the real data to synthetic data sets. After conducting identical analyses on simulated data sets, we do not find anything inconsistent with the presence of a stochastic GWB in the NANOGrav 15 yr data. The methodologies developed here can offer additional tools for application to future, more sensitive data sets. While this analysis provides an internal consistency check of the NANOGrav results, it does not eliminate the necessity for additional investigations that could identify potential systematics or uncover unmodeled physical phenomena in the data.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 978(2)
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.