Return of Clinically Actionable Pharmacogenetic Results From Molecular Tumor Board <scp>DNA</scp> Sequencing Data: Workflow and Estimated Costs

Pharmacogenetic testing can prevent severe toxicities from several oncology drug therapies; it also has the potential to improve the outcomes from supportive care drugs. Paired tumor and germline sequencing is increasingly common in oncology practice; these include sequencing of pharmacogenes, but the germline pharmacogenetic variants are rarely included in the clinical reports, despite many being clinically actionable. We established an informatics workflow to evaluate the clinical sequencing results for pharmacogenetic variants. We used the Aldy computational tool, which we have previously shown to determine the variant alleles in 14 pharmacogenes in clinical sequencing data with >99% accuracy, to identify pharmacogenetic variants in the clinical whole exome sequencing from our molecular tumor board. Patients with genetic variants that are clinically actionable for their individual therapy programs, including both treatment and supportive care, are referred to a clinical pharmacogenetics testing laboratory for confirmation. Through an evaluation of our weekly informatics workflow, we determined it took approximately 3.25 hours to complete the analysis of the sequencing data from approximately 20 patients. Using a United States pharmacist's median salary, we estimated the incremental added cost of the process to be only ~$15 per patient. This adds only a minor increase to the patient's cost of testing and has the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of their treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3545
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Return of Clinically Actionable Pharmacogenetic Results From Molecular Tumor Board DNA Sequencing Data: Workflow and Estimated Costs

Bryan P. Schneider, Todd C. Skaar, Hyunwoo Koo, John T. Callaghan et al.
1 links
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Return of Clinically Actionable Pharmacogenetic Results From Molecular Tumor Board DNA Sequencing Data: Workflow and Estimated Costs

Bryan P. Schneider, Todd C. Skaar, Hyunwoo Koo, John T. Callaghan, Wilberforce Osei, Mya Tran, Tyler Shugg, Steven M. Bray, Emma M. Tillman, Christopher A. Fausel, Tayler B. Smith
article en

Abstract

Pharmacogenetic testing can prevent severe toxicities from several oncology drug therapies; it also has the potential to improve the outcomes from supportive care drugs. Paired tumor and germline sequencing is increasingly common in oncology practice; these include sequencing of pharmacogenes, but the germline pharmacogenetic variants are rarely included in the clinical reports, despite many being clinically actionable. We established an informatics workflow to evaluate the clinical sequencing results for pharmacogenetic variants. We used the Aldy computational tool, which we have previously shown to determine the variant alleles in 14 pharmacogenes in clinical sequencing data with >99% accuracy, to identify pharmacogenetic variants in the clinical whole exome sequencing from our molecular tumor board. Patients with genetic variants that are clinically actionable for their individual therapy programs, including both treatment and supportive care, are referred to a clinical pharmacogenetics testing laboratory for confirmation. Through an evaluation of our weekly informatics workflow, we determined it took approximately 3.25 hours to complete the analysis of the sequencing data from approximately 20 patients. Using a United States pharmacist's median salary, we estimated the incremental added cost of the process to be only ~$15 per patient. This adds only a minor increase to the patient's cost of testing and has the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of their treatment.

Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsVol. 117(4)
Indiana University Health (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.