Medication adherence feedback with older adults with cognitive impairment: A mixed methods study

<b>Objective:</b> Older adults with cognitive impairment are at risk of medication-taking errors. This study assessed the impact of providing medication adherence feedback to cognitively impaired older adults. <b>Methods:</b> Forty participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia had their medication adherence electronically monitored for 8 weeks. They were provided with verbal and visual feedback about their adherence results. Initial participant reactions were elicited using a Motivational Interviewing approach, and self-reported behavior changes were assessed during a follow-up interview. Quantitative analyses assessed relationships among electronically monitored and self-rated adherence, initial reactions to adherence feedback, and subsequently reported medication self-management changes. Thematic analysis determined facilitators and barriers to making self-management changes. <b>Results:</b> Although self-rated adherence was high, electronic monitoring revealed that 20% of the sample had suboptimal adherence (took the recommended dose on <80% of monitored days). Fifty-three percent of the sample reported feeling surprised by their adherence results, and 45% endorsed initial motivation to change self-management behaviors. Motivated participants demonstrated worse electronically monitored adherence than unmotivated peers, and those who were surprised by their medication-taking errors expressed greater initial motivation to change. At follow-up, 50% reported having made changes, and 82.4% of them indicated that this study played a role. Facilitators of making changes included awareness of medication-taking errors and cognitive impairment, whereas barriers included lack of perceived difficulty/need. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence monitoring with feedback is feasible and impactful in cognitively impaired older adults. Increasing awareness of medication-taking errors fosters motivation to improve medication self-management and results in participant-reported behavior change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2447094
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medication adherence feedback with older adults with cognitive impairment: A mixed methods study

Lori A. Daiello, Seth A. Margolis, Kelli L. Sullivan, Persis Commissariat et al.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Medication adherence feedback with older adults with cognitive impairment: A mixed methods study

Lori A. Daiello, Seth A. Margolis, Kelli L. Sullivan, Persis Commissariat, Allyson Goldstein, Emily S. Hallowell, Jennifer Duncan Davis
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> Older adults with cognitive impairment are at risk of medication-taking errors. This study assessed the impact of providing medication adherence feedback to cognitively impaired older adults. <b>Methods:</b> Forty participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia had their medication adherence electronically monitored for 8 weeks. They were provided with verbal and visual feedback about their adherence results. Initial participant reactions were elicited using a Motivational Interviewing approach, and self-reported behavior changes were assessed during a follow-up interview. Quantitative analyses assessed relationships among electronically monitored and self-rated adherence, initial reactions to adherence feedback, and subsequently reported medication self-management changes. Thematic analysis determined facilitators and barriers to making self-management changes. <b>Results:</b> Although self-rated adherence was high, electronic monitoring revealed that 20% of the sample had suboptimal adherence (took the recommended dose on <80% of monitored days). Fifty-three percent of the sample reported feeling surprised by their adherence results, and 45% endorsed initial motivation to change self-management behaviors. Motivated participants demonstrated worse electronically monitored adherence than unmotivated peers, and those who were surprised by their medication-taking errors expressed greater initial motivation to change. At follow-up, 50% reported having made changes, and 82.4% of them indicated that this study played a role. Facilitators of making changes included awareness of medication-taking errors and cognitive impairment, whereas barriers included lack of perceived difficulty/need. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence monitoring with feedback is feasible and impactful in cognitively impaired older adults. Increasing awareness of medication-taking errors fosters motivation to improve medication self-management and results in participant-reported behavior change.

The Clinical NeuropsychologistVol. 39(7)
Joslin Diabetes Center (US), Harvard University (US), John Brown University (US), Providence College (US), Brown University (US), Veterans Health Administration (US), Providence VA Medical Center (US), Department of Veterans Affairs (AU), University of Maine (US)
Brown University, American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.