Transit Rivalry Or Partnership? INSTC Vs. Middle Corridor In Central Asia

The Middle Corridor and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) represent two significant transcontinental trade routes shaping Eurasian connectivity. Both corridors aim to diversify trade flows, reduce dependency on traditional maritime routes, and enhance economic integration. However, their overlapping geographic reach in Central Asia has raised questions about whether they are rivals competing for influence or potential partners fostering regional connectivity. This article examines the geopolitical, economic, and infrastructural dimensions of these corridors, analyzing their respective strengths, challenges, and strategic priorities. By assessing the interests of key stakeholders such as Russia, Iran, Turkey, and China, the study highlights areas of competition, including access to transit hubs and trade facilitation policies, as well as opportunities for collaboration, such as shared infrastructure and mutual reduction of logistical costs. The findings underscore the corridors' complementary potential in driving sustainable development and enhancing Eurasia's strategic role in global trade, provided regional and international actors prioritize cooperative frameworks over zero-sum competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2912042127
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transit Rivalry Or Partnership? INSTC Vs. Middle Corridor In Central Asia

Debashis Chatterjee
IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Belt and Road Initiative
article

Transit Rivalry Or Partnership? INSTC Vs. Middle Corridor In Central Asia

Debashis Chatterjee
article en

Abstract

The Middle Corridor and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) represent two significant transcontinental trade routes shaping Eurasian connectivity. Both corridors aim to diversify trade flows, reduce dependency on traditional maritime routes, and enhance economic integration. However, their overlapping geographic reach in Central Asia has raised questions about whether they are rivals competing for influence or potential partners fostering regional connectivity. This article examines the geopolitical, economic, and infrastructural dimensions of these corridors, analyzing their respective strengths, challenges, and strategic priorities. By assessing the interests of key stakeholders such as Russia, Iran, Turkey, and China, the study highlights areas of competition, including access to transit hubs and trade facilitation policies, as well as opportunities for collaboration, such as shared infrastructure and mutual reduction of logistical costs. The findings underscore the corridors' complementary potential in driving sustainable development and enhancing Eurasia's strategic role in global trade, provided regional and international actors prioritize cooperative frameworks over zero-sum competition.

IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social ScienceVol. 29(12)
Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transit Rivalry Or Partnership? INSTC Vs. Middle Corridor In Central Asia — Debashis Chatterjee · IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS