Worse for Women, Bad for All: A 62-Nation Study Confirms and Extends Ambivalent Sexism Principles to Reveal Greater Social Dysfunction in Sexist Nations

We retested core ambivalent sexism theory tenets and explored novel correlations with national outcomes in 62 nations. Replicating Glick et al., cross-national analyses supported (a) hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) as cross-culturally recognizable, complementary ideologies associated with gender inequality; (b) women appearing to be influenced by, but also resisting men’s HS and embracing BS to counter men’s HS (outscoring men in some highly sexist nations). Novel cross-national comparisons showed (a) men’s HS and both genders’ BS correlated with fewer women in paid work, whereas only BS correlated with domestic labor inequity, (b) both HS and BS correlated with accepting intimate partner violence toward women. Finally, HS and BS correlated with generally dysfunctional national outcomes: antidemocratic tendencies, less productivity, more collective violence, and lower healthy lifespan for both genders. Results reinforce that BS harms women and suggest men also have a stake in reducing sexist ideologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241302882
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
54.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worse for Women, Bad for All: A 62-Nation Study Confirms and Extends Ambivalent Sexism Principles to Reveal Greater Social Dysfunction in Sexist Nations

Michał Olech, Natasza Kosakowska‐Berezecka, Paweł Jurek, Jurand Sobiecki et al.
13 citations
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Social and Intergroup Psychology
54.62
article

Worse for Women, Bad for All: A 62-Nation Study Confirms and Extends Ambivalent Sexism Principles to Reveal Greater Social Dysfunction in Sexist Nations

Michał Olech, Natasza Kosakowska‐Berezecka, Paweł Jurek, Jurand Sobiecki, Magdalena Zawisza, Magdalena Żadkowska, Anna Włodarczyk, Joseph A. Vandello, Saba Safdar, Tomasz Besta, Jennifer K. Bosson, Deborah L. Best, Peter Glick
article en
13 citations

Abstract

We retested core ambivalent sexism theory tenets and explored novel correlations with national outcomes in 62 nations. Replicating Glick et al., cross-national analyses supported (a) hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) as cross-culturally recognizable, complementary ideologies associated with gender inequality; (b) women appearing to be influenced by, but also resisting men’s HS and embracing BS to counter men’s HS (outscoring men in some highly sexist nations). Novel cross-national comparisons showed (a) men’s HS and both genders’ BS correlated with fewer women in paid work, whereas only BS correlated with domestic labor inequity, (b) both HS and BS correlated with accepting intimate partner violence toward women. Finally, HS and BS correlated with generally dysfunctional national outcomes: antidemocratic tendencies, less productivity, more collective violence, and lower healthy lifespan for both genders. Results reinforce that BS harms women and suggest men also have a stake in reducing sexist ideologies.

Social Psychological and Personality ScienceVol. 16(8)
Lawrence University (US), University of South Florida (US), Universidad Católica del Norte (CL), University of Gdańsk (PL), Wake Forest University (US), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), Gdańsk Medical University (PL), University of Guelph (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
54.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.